#1
LDAC support is a major perk for compatible Android devices and can improve detail, but it typically reduces battery life compared with SBC/AAC.
#2
LDAC is available for higher-quality wireless audio on compatible devices, but it may need enabling and can reduce battery life versus AAC.
#3
LDAC is available for hi-res Bluetooth streaming on compatible Android devices, providing a quality boost for supported tracks; it is the primary high-quality codec path for the XM6.
#4
LDAC is repeatedly called out as a major advantage for Android users seeking higher-quality Bluetooth audio. Some reviewers report tradeoffs where enabling LDAC can disable features like spatial sound or personalization options.
#5
LDAC is supported and can improve perceived detail/space on compatible sources; trade-offs include reduced battery life in some modes and potential for slight latency depending on device/settings.
#6
LDAC is supported for high‑resolution wireless on compatible Android devices, but the audible benefit can be subtle for some listeners and it may reduce battery life versus AAC.
#7
Support for LDAC alongside AAC and SBC enables high bitrate Bluetooth listening, with 660kbps delivering an excellent blend of fidelity and stability, while the highest bitrate mode may occasionally hiccup in tougher wireless conditions.
#8
LDAC can improve perceived detail and clarity when it successfully engages, but device compatibility is inconsistent and some phones may default to AAC/SBC or fail to switch to LDAC.
#9
Several reviewers explicitly note that LDAC is not supported on the PX7 S3, which can be a downside for Android users who rely on LDAC as the more common hi-res Bluetooth option. Most frame this as a trade-off versus the aptX Lossless/Snapdragon Sound direction, and note it may matter less for iOS users or for listeners who use USB-C wired playback. Overall, lack of LDAC is the consistent negative mention in codec coverage.
#10
LDAC is not supported, and multiple reviews explicitly call this the biggest codec omission versus some competitors—particularly for Android users who prioritize the highest-bitrate Bluetooth option.
#11
LDAC is not supported, and some comparisons call this out when weighing against Sony and other Android-focused competitors that do offer LDAC.
#12
LDAC is not supported, so Android hi-res listeners will rely on aptX Adaptive/Lossless or use USB-C for the most faithful playback.
#13
LDAC is not supported, so hi-res Bluetooth streaming via LDAC isn’t available even from compatible Android sources.
#14
There is no LDAC support, so Android users cannot use LDAC high-bitrate Bluetooth streaming with the Studio Pro.
#15
No LDAC support, so high-bitrate Sony LDAC Bluetooth streaming is unavailable.
#16
No LDAC support is repeatedly cited, so high-bitrate Bluetooth streaming is not available.
#17
LDAC is not supported, which limits hi‑res codec options on many Android phones outside the Samsung ecosystem. Reviewers who value codec flexibility called this a notable omission.
#18
LDAC is not supported, so compatible Android devices can’t use Sony’s hi-res Bluetooth codec with these headphones. For listeners who prioritize hi-res wireless on Android, this omission is frequently cited as a drawback.
#19
LDAC support is absent, so listeners cannot take advantage of Sony style high bitrate Bluetooth streaming on compatible devices.
#20
LDAC is not supported, which may matter to Android users who prefer Sony’s LDAC ecosystem. Buyers specifically seeking LDAC should consider alternative earbuds.
#21
LDAC is not supported, so Bluetooth performance relies on more basic SBC/AAC codecs.