Best Polar Smart Watch for running power support

running power support Decision Dashboard

Best for running power support

Polar Grit X

4.8 feature score

Highest scored product for this feature based on supporting review evidence.

Safest pick

Polar Vantage M2

4.8 feature score

Balances feature score, supporting reviews, and overall product strength.

Most evidence

Polar Pacer Pro

6 supporting reviews

Has the broadest review evidence for this feature.

Best overall product

Polar Grit X Pro

3.7 overall score

Strongest overall product among items with scored evidence for this feature.

See ranked products
Narrow by brand

Showing Polar only. Switch back to all brands anytime.

#1 Polar Grit X
4.8
4 reviews

Running power support was repeatedly praised as useful, convenient, and unusually strong without a separate footpod.

Pros: materials quality, recovery insights

Cons: contactless payments, music controls

#2 Polar Vantage M2
4.8
1 review

Running power support was praised for external STRYD-style support and native handling, despite the lack of wrist-based power.

Pros: running power support, fitness tracking accuracy

Cons: contactless payments, smartphone notifications

#3 Polar Grit X Pro
4.5
5 reviews

Running power support was strongly praised, especially by triathlon and trail-focused reviewers who value native power for pacing and power-zone training.

Pros: water resistance, health tracking accuracy

Cons: contactless payments, onboard music storage

#4 Polar Vantage V2
4.4
2 reviews

Running power support was positive where tested, with reviewers finding wrist-based running power usable and trend data well aligned.

Pros: workout tracking variety, build quality

Cons: blood oxygen tracking, onboard music storage

#5 Polar Pacer Pro
4.3
6 reviews

Running power support was broadly positive because wrist-based power appears at this price, though one reviewer still preferred STRYD for accuracy.

Pros: workout tracking variety, activity auto-detection

Cons: onboard music storage, blood oxygen tracking

#6 Polar Pacer
1.9
4 reviews

Running power support is a limitation because reviewers wanted it or noted that the Pacer requires an external sensor while rivals or the Pro offer more.

Pros: third-party app support, comfort

Cons: contactless payments, onboard music storage

#7 Polar Ignite 2
1.5
1 review

Running power support was weak because a reviewer noted that wrist-based running power is absent compared with higher-end Polar watches.

Pros: wellness insights, coaching features

Cons: mapping and navigation, contactless payments