Call quality was strongly praised, with reviewers highlighting clearer voice pickup, better mics, and strong performance in noisy settings.
Pros: Smart Pause performance, Award recognition
Cons: Cable quality, USB-C
Best 2025 Over-Ear Headphones for Microphone quality for calls
Narrow by product type
Showing Over-Ear Headphones only. Switch back to all Headphones & Earbuds anytime.
Release year
Call microphone quality was praised, including calls going smoothly and the mics sounding excellent.
Pros: Instrument separation, USB-C
Cons: Button control usability, Maximum volume clarity
Call quality was usually rated good to excellent, with callers or reviewers noting clear, understandable voice transmission.
Pros: Award recognition, Audio-video sync accuracy
Cons: ANC sound impact on audio, ANC effect on sound signature
Call microphone quality was generally strong, often described as clear or high quality, though one review found it merely acceptable.
Pros: Immersive audio quality, ANC background noise level
Cons: Replaceable pads/headband, Replaceable earpads
Call and mic quality were generally strong, ranging from top-tier to good enough, with occasional unevenness or fuzz.
Pros: Button control usability, Design and Aesthetics
Cons: Water/sweat resistance rating, Included accessories
Call microphone quality is mostly good to excellent, though a few reviewers find it less clear than Apple or Sony.
Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Multipoint connectivity reliability
Cons: LDAC, Wear detection performance
Call quality is usually strong, with clear two-way voice performance, although microphone use through certain modes or dongles can hurt audio behavior.
Pros: Instrument separation, Charging
Cons: Xbox compatibility, Water/sweat resistance rating
Call quality is considered good to very good, with voices remaining clear in typical environments, though not always as noise-free as top call-focused rivals.
Pros: ANC effect on sound signature, Multi-platform compatibility
Cons: LE Audio readiness, Auracast support
Microphone quality itself is good in quiet conditions, even if background noise filtering is less strong.
Pros: Codec support, aptX
Cons: LDAC, Water/sweat resistance rating
Call quality ranged from acceptable to excellent, with some reviewers praising clarity and others finding the voice quality merely decent or processed.
Pros: Volume output, Active noise cancellation
Cons: Water/sweat resistance rating, USB-C
Call microphone quality was generally serviceable to strong, with reviewers praising clarity in some conditions while noting wired mics or premium call setups still do better.
Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Headband adjustability
Cons: Cable quality, Smart Pause performance
Call microphone quality is usually good enough to excellent, but not every reviewer finds it full-bodied or exceptional.
Pros: Award recognition, ANC sound impact on audio
Cons: Water/sweat resistance rating, LE Audio readiness
Call microphone quality was inconsistent but often positive, ranging from average or weak in cars/noise to excellent in several reviews.
Pros: Battery, ANC sound impact on audio
Cons: 3.5mm analog input availability, Treble clarity
Call mic quality was mixed-to-positive: several reviewers heard clear calls, while others described the mic as merely fine, tinny, or robotic.
Pros: Smart Pause performance, App
Cons: Wear detection performance, Wear detection auto-pause
Call quality is generally acceptable, with several reviewers reporting clear or complaint-free calls despite some nuance and sibilance issues.
Pros: Stability, Bluetooth
Cons: Smudge resistance, Smart Pause performance
Call use was mixed to weak: voice pickup was decent, but the lack of self-hearing/transparency made wireless calls tiring.
Pros: Audio-video sync accuracy, Clamping force comfort
Cons: Transparency mode quality, Sustainability and repairability