Bissell CrossWave Vacuum Cleaner

3.7

(14)

Bottom Line

Choose the Bissell CrossWave if you want a one-pass vacuum‑and‑mop for hard floors and quick wet spills; Skip it if you hate post-clean cleanup or need true deep-grout/carpet cleaning—its tanks/solution and upkeep demands are the tradeoff.

Best for

Homes with mostly sealed hard floors that regularly deal with spills, muddy footprints, or pet hair and want wet-and-dry cleanup in one routine. Also great for people who prefer quick daily maintenance over occasional deep scrubbing.

Not for

Anyone expecting deep grout restoration or a true replacement for a dedicated carpet vacuum. Also a poor fit if you don’t want to empty/rinse tanks, wash filters, and manage cleaning solution frequently.

Verdict

The CrossWave line shines as a wet/dry floor cleaner for sealed hard floors: reviewers consistently saw strong pickup of everyday crumbs and impressive handling of messy spills, with quick-drying passes that reduce puddles. Corded versions bring noticeably higher raw power and larger tanks, while cordless variants feel lighter and more convenient but run about 25–30 minutes and refill sooner. The tradeoff is ownership overhead—expect frequent tank emptying, filter/brush rinsing, and a self-clean cycle that helps but doesn’t fully dry everything. It’s also not a deep-grout solution and can be awkward on full carpet. reviews

Pros

Assembly and Setup 4.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.7

Setup is repeatedly described as quick and beginner-friendly, typically involving snapping the handle in place and filling the clean-water/solution tank.
Steam Cleaning 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.6

Steam is presented as a differentiator for HydroSteam variants, helping loosen dried-on messes. Non-steam CrossWave models don’t provide this benefit.
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.6

Pet owners and demos show strong hair pickup on hard floors, including dog hair, though brush rolls still benefit from routine clearing to prevent buildup.
Streaking / Residue 4.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.6

Most reviews report minimal streaking when used properly, especially on wet messes. Very sticky liquids may still need extra passes to avoid residue.
Floorhead Seal on Hard Floors 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.5

Soft rollers are credited with maintaining close contact on hard floors, helping with both fine dust and scattered debris without obvious loss of seal.
Suitability for small spaces 4.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.5

Compact footprint and easy steering make it appealing for apartments, condos, and tight layouts; smaller cordless heads are singled out as especially nimble.
Mopping performance 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.4

There’s broad agreement it cleans sealed hard floors well while vacuuming at the same time. Rug cleaning can work on small area rugs, but results are less consistent than on hard floors.
Cordless convenience 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Cordless variants are repeatedly praised for grab-and-go mobility and less hassle around furniture, while corded versions trade freedom for consistent power and longer sessions.
Fresh Liquid Pickup Speed 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.4

Wet pickup is a highlight: multiple demos show it swallowing milk/cereal-type spills effectively when you move slowly enough for the roller and suction to recover liquid.
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4

Soft rollers are repeatedly praised for sweeping up fine debris (like sugar/dust) on hard floors, contributing to the ‘vacuum while you wash’ feel that reviewers like on sealed surfaces.
Self-propel feature 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 4.4

At least one cordless reviewer notes the powered roller provides forward pull, which can make it feel somewhat self-propelled once you match the right pace.
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.4

Hard-floor debris pickup is frequently praised (e.g., cereal and larger crumbs). A few reviews note occasional pieces getting pushed ahead or some larger chunks left behind depending on roller design and speed.
Cord length 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 4.4

Corded reviews repeatedly cite a 25‑ft cord as a practical reach for room-to-room cleaning without constant replugging.
Pet-Ready Features 4.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.4

Multiple reviews highlight strong pickup of pet hair and the usefulness of pet-focused brush rolls/formulas on some variants, making the CrossWave line popular for pet households with hard floors.
Floor Drying Time 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.3

Drying is generally fast, especially when doing backward ‘dry’ passes or using low water mode; several reviewers mention no puddles and floors feeling dry quickly.
Sanitizing performance 4.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.3

Reviews associate increased sanitizing confidence with heated/steam variants. Non-heated models rely on solution, agitation, and recovery rather than true steam sanitizing.
Ease of use 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 4.2

Many reviewers describe straightforward day-to-day operation and easy steering, but ease drops when dealing with frequent maintenance, sensor quirks, or using it on carpet.
Versatility 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 4.2

Reviewers value the CrossWave concept for combining vacuuming and mopping, especially on sealed hard floors and occasional small rugs. The same sources caution it’s not a one-tool solution for deep carpet work or grout restoration.
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance 4.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 4.2

Hair wrap is described as manageable, and some variants are positioned as tangle-free/pet-focused. Even so, reviewers still plan on periodic brush-roll cleaning.
Controls & UI 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 4.0

Controls are generally described as simple (hard floor/rug or low/high water modes). Corded models often use an on-demand trigger for solution, while some cordless versions dispense automatically; preferences split between manual control and hands-off operation.
Suction & Airflow 4.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 4.0

Corded CrossWave comparisons describe noticeably stronger raw suction than some rivals, while a few cordless/Edge impressions feel less punchy or slower-acting. Overall, power is a strength for corded models and more mixed on battery-powered ones.
Odor control 3.9 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.9

Users like the smell of branded cleaning solutions, but they also warn that you still need to wash tanks/rollers after smelly spills to prevent lingering odors.
Support & Reliability 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.8

One review calls out a 2‑year warranty. Reliability discussion centers more on sensor behavior and self-clean consistency than long-term part failure.
Area Rug Handling 3.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.8

Performance on area rugs is mixed: some owners are impressed on small rugs, while other testers recommend vacuuming first and caution that it’s not ideal for deeper carpet/rug cleaning.
Battery & Charging 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.7

Cordless models rely on a charging base that may also support the self-clean routine. Convenience is tempered by shorter run time and the need to dock between cleans.
Overall opinion 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 11 reviews 3.7

Across sources, the CrossWave concept is widely appreciated for routine wet/dry floor care, though a minority of reviewers are unimpressed with specific cordless/Edge models and recommend alternatives at similar prices.
Hair Pickup — Carpets 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 3.7

Some owners use it on carpet for hair in a pinch and see pickup, but reviews repeatedly note it’s not designed as a primary carpet vacuum and can be harder to push on carpet.
Storage footprint & upright-stand stability 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.7

Several reviewers find the unit compact and easy to store, but at least one cordless owner notes it doesn’t stand on its own the way they’d like, increasing dependence on the dock/leaning storage.
Price & Value 3.7 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 11 reviews 3.7

Value perceptions depend heavily on model and sale price: the original/corded CrossWave is praised as a budget standout, while some cordless/Edge-style entries are criticized as overpriced or outperformed by newer competitors.
Dried-On Stain Removal 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.6

Sticky and dried-on spills often come up with extra passes, but grout restoration is explicitly called out as a limitation on standard models. HydroSteam-style units are reported to do better on dried-on messes thanks to heat/steam.
Filtration / Dust Containment 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.6

Reviews mention a washable filter that can help with dust/allergens, but it needs regular rinsing and thorough drying to avoid buildup and odors.
Weight 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.6

Weights around 11–12+ lb are noted for corded units, and cordless models can feel either light or battery-heavy depending on design. Most find it usable, but some call it heavy.
Heating element 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.6

Standard CrossWave models are explicitly described as lacking a heating element, while HydroSteam variants add heat to generate steam and boost dried-on performance.
Self-cleaning cycle 3.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 8 reviews 3.6

Most variants include a self-clean routine using a tray or charging base. It generally helps flush debris and dirty water, but some models require user involvement and most reports still recommend removing parts to fully dry the brush/avoid smells.
Water tank 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 3.5

The dual-tank setup (clean and dirty) is widely appreciated, but capacity varies by model: some corded units are called larger than competitors while HF3-style cordless tanks are described as small. Several reviewers also note the dirty/recovery tank can fill quickly.

Cons

Solution / Liquid system 3.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 11 reviews 3.5

Most versions use a two-tank clean/dirty setup. Corded units commonly let you dispense solution with a trigger, while some cordless models auto-dose; limited dwell time means stubborn spots may need repeat passes and more solution.
Floorhead design 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.4

Soft rollers and multi-surface brush designs perform well on hard floors, but design differences (open vs closed fronts, short gates, multi-piece covers) influence big-chunk pickup and how messy the head gets.
Maneuverability & Handling 3.4 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 7 reviews 3.4

Swivel steering helps around obstacles and is often described as a plus, yet some reviewers find swivel range limited or the unit harder to push on carpet. Lighter cordless models tend to feel easiest to guide.
Headlight & LED lights 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.3

Some CrossWave variants include LEDs that help spot debris, but lighting availability and placement vary, and at least one comparison prefers a competitor’s lights.
Comparative performance 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 6 reviews 3.3

Compared with rivals, CrossWave is often described as very effective on hard floors, with corded versions winning on raw power but losing on noise and automation. Some roundups rate certain CrossWave variants as lagging behind newer wet/dry competitors.
Accessories & Tools 3.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.3

Included extras vary by bundle: some come with multiple brush rolls, a tray, tools, and solution, while at least one newer purchase lacked an extra roller or cleaning brush. Check the kit contents before buying.
Dirty water sensor 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 4 reviews 3.2

Cordless reviews often mention a full-tank alert/sensor that can shut the unit down. A recurring gripe is that bubbles or float behavior may trigger the warning early, forcing an emptying even when the tank isn’t truly full.
Maintenance requirements 3.2 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 10 reviews 3.2

Upkeep is consistently emphasized: empty/rinse the dirty tank after use, clean the filter and brush roll, and occasionally disassemble parts. The self-clean function helps flush the system but doesn’t eliminate hands-on cleaning.
Runtime (Measured, Default) 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 3.1

Cordless runtime is commonly reported around 25–30 minutes, which can be limiting for larger homes or multiple rooms in one session.
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries) 3.1 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 reviews 3.1

Several reviews mention going through solution quickly and needing periodic filter/brush replacements; one estimate puts ongoing costs around $40/year depending on use and parts replaced.
Edge & Baseboard Cleaning (Hard Floors) 3.0 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5 reviews 3.0

Edge results are mixed: some testing shows corners and tight edges can be missed, while others report the head running right up to the edge on flat flooring. Expect occasional touch-ups along walls or in corners.
Airflow blowback 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.8

A newer-model owner notes some water can kick backward during the self-clean routine, indicating occasional splash/back-spray is possible in certain situations.
Suitability for heavy-duty use 2.8 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.8

A professional review frames it as excellent for maintenance cleaning but not a ‘silver bullet’ for heavily soiled grout or restoration-level jobs.
Noise level 2.6 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 3 reviews 2.6

Noise is a recurring complaint: several reviewers call it louder than expected, and one roundup cites very loud operation for the HydroSteam class. If quiet cleaning matters, this is a downside.
Cord management 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5

One comparison complains the cord exits low and can be annoying during use, suggesting cord routing/management isn’t a standout feature.
Energy efficiency (kWh) 2.5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.5

One head-to-head comparison notes the CrossWave drawing substantially more power than a competitor while delivering higher suction, implying a power-versus-efficiency tradeoff.
Under-Furniture Pickup 2.3 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1 review 2.3

At least one comparison flags limited lay-flat/under-furniture reach on a CrossWave model, suggesting tight under-sofa cleaning may require a different tool.

FAQ

Can the CrossWave replace my regular vacuum?

Reviews consistently frame it as best on sealed hard floors and as a vacuum‑and‑wash tool. It can handle some rug/carpet hair, but multiple reviewers warn it isn’t designed to replace a dedicated carpet vacuum for whole-home carpet cleaning.

How much maintenance does it need after each use?

Most reviewers recommend emptying and rinsing the dirty tank after every session and cleaning/rinsing the filter and brush roll regularly. The self-clean cycle helps flush the system, but several reviews still suggest removing parts to fully clean and dry them.

Does it deep clean grout lines?

A professional review specifically says it’s not a silver bullet for restoring filthy grout. It can help maintain cleaner floors between deep cleanings, but truly embedded grout staining may still require pre-spray, dwell time, and manual agitation.

Will it leave my floors wet or streaky?

Many reviews report fast drying with minimal streaking when you use the right mode and do backward “dry” passes. Sticky spills (like syrupy liquids) may need extra passes to avoid residue, and edges/corners can require touch-ups.

Corded vs cordless: which is better?

Corded CrossWave models are described as having stronger raw power and often larger tanks, but they’re louder and you manage a cord. Cordless HF3-style models are praised for convenience and maneuverability, yet typical runtimes are around 25–30 minutes with smaller tanks and occasional sensor quirks.