Garmin Approach S44

Garmin Approach S44 Review

Brand: Garmin
Released: January 21, 2025
Updated: 2 months ago
4.1
Overall review score
121
Review evidence points
37
Scored features
9
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Garmin Approach S44 for a slim, accurate golf-first watch with a standout AMOLED screen. Skip it if you want deep health tracking, full smartwatch tools, or advanced maps without a subscription.

Best for

Best for golfers who want a slim, easy, golf-first Garmin watch with accurate yardages, strong display quality, basic notifications, and solid battery life. It fits players who care more about course essentials than all-day health tracking.

Not for

Not for buyers who want a true smartwatch replacement, deep wellness metrics, heart-rate-based training data, or advanced maps and slope-style guidance without paying for subscriptions or a higher-tier model.

Verdict

Across the reviews, the Garmin Approach S44 stands out as a golf-first watch with a vivid AMOLED display, accurate yardages, strong comfort, and a price that many reviewers considered compelling. Its best evidence centers on the course: readable yardages, useful hole views, score prompts, shot tracking, and Garmin ecosystem links. The tradeoff is that Garmin kept the off-course side intentionally lean. Reviewers repeatedly noted missing health and wellness tools, limited smartwatch depth, basic activity tracking, and advanced map or slope features that often require a subscription or a step up to pricier models. That makes the S44 feel polished for essential golf, but intentionally constrained as an all-day wearable.

Current model
Garmin Approach S70
Garmin Approach S70
4.2 May 31, 2023
View current model

Feature Scorecards

Summary

37 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (54%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    9 (24%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (8%)

Pros

  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    display quality: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Display quality was the strongest point of agreement, with every review praising the AMOLED screen as sharp, beautiful, crisp, vibrant, or a major upgrade.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was strongly praised, with reviewers calling it fabulous or impressive and reporting multi-round use or 10-day everyday endurance.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 4.3, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Value was mostly positive due to the AMOLED screen, Garmin quality, and golf tools at the price, but some reviewers questioned it when subscriptions or broader smartwatch needs enter the picture.
  • fit
    4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    fit: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Fit was praised for slimness, security during the swing, thin profile, and suitability for smaller wrists, though larger-wrist buyers may disagree.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    comfort: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort was generally strong thanks to the lightweight, slim form factor, though one review noted the strap started rigid before loosening.
  • 4.9
    3 reviews strong consensus
    user interface: 4.9, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers found the interface intuitive, simple, and easy to use, especially for golfers who want essential features without being overwhelmed.

Cons

  • 2.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    wellness insights: 2.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Wellness insight coverage was a major weakness because reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of heart rate, sleep, stress, body battery, and other lifestyle metrics.
  • 2.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    workout tracking variety: 2.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Workout tracking was consistently described as basic: useful for simple walk, run, bike, and swim-style activity logs, but not close to Garmin's fuller activity feature set.
  • 2.7
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    smartwatch features: 2.7, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Smartwatch functionality was the clearest compromise: reviewers found it handy for basics, but repeatedly described it as golf-first, stripped down, or not a full smartwatch replacement.
  • 2.3
    1 review
    charging convenience: 2.3, 1 review
    Charging convenience was criticized because the watch still uses Garmin's proprietary charger, creating travel and replacement concerns.
  • 2.4
    1 review
    cross-platform compatibility: 2.4, 1 review
    Cross-platform experience was criticized mainly for iPhone notification limitations, while Android users were described as having more customization.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    size options: 3.0, 1 review
    Size evidence was limited and mixed, with one reviewer warning the S44 could feel too small for some wrists.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in activity auto-detection, user interface, score tracking, near average in mapping and navigation, comfort, below average in wellness insights, workout tracking variety, cross-platform compatibility.

Comparison summary

37 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    20 (54%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    10 (27%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    7 (19%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
wellness insights 2.0 4.0 -2.0
workout tracking variety 2.5 4.3 -1.9
cross-platform compatibility 2.4 3.6 -1.2
activity auto-detection 4.8 3.7 +1.1
user interface 4.9 3.8 +1.1
charging convenience 2.3 3.3 -1.0
score tracking 4.7 3.7 +1.0
app ecosystem 4.5 3.6 +0.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better style and design

Choose Garmin Approach S62. It scores 4.7 vs 4.1 for style and design, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better cross-platform compatibility

Choose Garmin Forerunner 255. It scores 4.8 vs 2.4 for cross-platform compatibility, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better workout tracking variety

Choose Garmin Forerunner 570. It scores 4.7 vs 2.5 for workout tracking variety, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better customization options

Choose Garmin Instinct 3. It scores 4.8 vs 3.8 for customization options, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: daily driver smartwatch use The reviewer recommends paying more for the Approach S50 if the watch must be a daily driver.
  • Better: off-course smartwatch functionality The reviewer says buyers wanting a full smartwatch should spend more for the Approach S50.
  • Better: daily fitness tracking replacement The reviewer says the S44 cannot replace an Apple Watch for daily fitness tracking.
  • Better: health features The S44 can work as a smartwatch but lacks the health features found on the Approach S70.

FAQ

Is the Garmin Approach S44 accurate for golf yardages?

Yes. Reviewers described its yardages as accurate, consistent, and close to course markers or rangefinder checks.

Is the AMOLED display a real upgrade?

Yes. The display was the strongest point of agreement, with reviewers calling it bright, crisp, beautiful, and much better than older Garmin entry-level screens.

Can the S44 replace a full smartwatch?

Not really. Reviews said it handles basics like notifications, weather, calendar items, and music controls, but falls short for replies, health metrics, and deeper daily-wear features.

Does the S44 have strong fitness and wellness tracking?

No. Reviewers repeatedly noted missing or limited health features such as heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, stress monitoring, and broader lifestyle metrics.

Are the advanced golf maps included?

Core maps and yardages are included, but reviewers criticized that more advanced maps, green contours, plays-like features, or slope-style upgrades may require Garmin Golf membership.

Who should consider stepping up from the S44?

Golfers who want richer health tracking, more advanced golf tools, or a better all-day wearable experience were often pointed toward higher-tier Garmin models.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: pairing reliability, brightness

Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity

#2 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem

Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability

#3 Garmin Lily 2 Active
4.3

Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...

Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking

Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage

#4 Tag Heuer Connected Calibre E4
4.3

Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.

Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability

Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling