If you want better makeup quality
Choose Stop! That! Train!. It scores 5.0 vs 1.2 for makeup quality, with a 3.5 overall score.
Moana Movie Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for Catherine Laga’aia, Rena Owen, the familiar songs, and vibrant Polynesian representation. Skip it if you expect a fresh adventure; flat CGI, sluggish pacing, and near-shot-for-shot storytelling make the animated original the stronger choice.
Best for
Best for families or younger viewers who have not seen the animated film and want its songs and story performed by a strong Polynesian cast. It also suits fans especially interested in the costumes, cultural detail, and live performers.
Not for
Skip it if you want a bold reinterpretation, convincing live-action realism, or a stronger version of the familiar adventure. Existing fans may find the animated original more vibrant, funnier, and better paced.
Verdict
The live-action Moana survives on the strength of material that already worked: memorable songs, a clear coming-of-age adventure, and meaningful Polynesian representation. Catherine Laga’aia brings warmth, determination, and a strong voice, while Rena Owen gives the film its most affecting human moments. The craft is less consistent. Costumes, practical island details, tropical cinematography, and parts of the score impress, but the green-screen ocean, hybrid creatures, and Maui’s prosthetic look often feel artificial. Most critics also find the nearly beat-for-beat approach creatively unnecessary, with sluggish stretches and little reason to prefer it over the animated film. It remains watchable family entertainment, especially for newcomers, but its best qualities are inherited and its weakest choices come from trying to reproduce animation too literally.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
45 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.013 (29%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.45 (11%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.49 (20%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.413 (29%)
-
Very negative below 1.55 (11%)
Pros
Sort
-
The Polynesian and Pacific Islander cast, dance, music, community rituals, and physical diversity are consistently celebrated. The live performers make Motunui’s culture feel more tangible and specific.
-
The returning songs are the remake’s most consistent strength, with How Far I’ll Go, We Know the Way, You’re Welcome, and Shiny still landing. The new end-credits song receives much weaker reactions.
-
The practical clothing is one of the remake’s clearest craft strengths, with rich texture, careful cultural detail, and convincing weathering. Liz McGregor’s work translates the animated designs with impressive precision.
-
The core tale of identity, leadership, restoration, and voyaging remains strong, clear, and emotionally accessible. The remake benefits greatly from inheriting one of Disney’s better modern stories.
-
The strongest images are crisp tropical vistas, sweeping island views, and bright ocean colors. Oscar Faura’s long shots give the production some genuine scale even when effects-heavy scenes feel enclosed.
-
Motunui, the boats, and the practical island spaces show strong craftsmanship and texture. The production is most convincing before the adventure moves into heavily digital settings.
-
The physical sets, costumes, hair, and weathered details are carefully executed. These tangible elements stand out positively against the less convincing digital environments.
-
Rena Owen, John Tui, and Frankie Adams add warmth, dignity, and family texture. Owen in particular is repeatedly singled out for scene-stealing emotional presence.
-
Catherine Laga’aia is one of the film’s most dependable strengths, bringing an earnest presence, likability, and a strong singing voice to Moana.
-
Moana and Maui sometimes have snappy, playful friction that keeps the adventure moving. Other critics found the pairing awkward, stiff, or short on the effortless camaraderie of the animated film.
-
Moana’s growth into a confident leader remains satisfying, and her determination comes through clearly. Maui’s vulnerability and the pair’s bonding receive less depth than they need.
-
The coming-of-age themes are presented clearly enough for children while still carrying ideas about identity, duty, and courage for older viewers.
-
The final act earns praise for its warmth, visual lift, and emotional release. The choral score helps the conclusion feel more stirring than several of the middle sections.
-
Moana’s story remains refreshingly free of a love interest. The focus stays on leadership, identity, family, and friendship rather than forcing a romance into her journey.
-
Mark Mancina’s Pacific Island–inflected choral scoring gives the finale weight and urgency. The music is especially effective when supporting the story’s cultural and emotional peaks.
-
The ocean, storms, and environmental effects receive strong, immersive treatment. In a premium theater, the surrounding waves and weather add welcome scale.
-
The ocean, mythology, village life, and animated flourishes create a colorful world between live action and fantasy. The cultural specificity is more convincing than the digital physicality.
-
The editing keeps portions of the adventure moving cleanly, but some transitions and scene rhythms feel clunky. Momentum is strongest during the musical numbers.
Cons
Sort
-
The overwhelming complaint is that the remake adds almost nothing new. Its shot-for-shot instincts, recycled staging, and fear of meaningful change make it feel more like imitation than reinterpretation.
-
The central value problem is that a more vivid version is already widely available. Paying theater prices for a near-copy with flatter visuals is difficult to justify for viewers who know the original.
-
The tropical palette, costumes, and occasional stylized musical passages can be attractive. Much of the movie still looks flat, overprocessed, stagebound, or less vibrant than the animation it copies.
-
Maui’s wig, prosthetic bodysuit, and overly literal physical recreation are among the most repeated complaints. The look is frequently described as artificial, distracting, or costume-like.
-
Critical response is predominantly negative, centered on the remake’s lack of purpose and invention. A smaller group considers it a buoyant or at least competent entry among Disney’s live-action adaptations.
-
The mix of actors, green screens, digital water, and cartoon-like creatures rarely feels physically coherent. Many scenes look polished but not convincingly real.
-
The voyage often drags between musical highlights, and several critics felt every minute of the nearly two-hour runtime. Familiarity makes slower passages feel even longer.
-
Thomas Kail handles some musical and village scenes with energy, but the broader direction is often described as anonymous, stagebound, and overly dependent on the animated blueprint.
-
The remake often inspires a desire to revisit the animated original instead. Its limited surprises and weaker visual translation reduce the incentive for repeat viewing.
-
The songs, cultural detail, and occasional bursts of whimsy provide real pleasure. Overall enjoyment is limited by repetition, flat stretches, and the constant sense that the animated film offers the same experience more vividly.
-
The animated tattoos and a few stylized musical moments work well, but many hybrid creatures look awkward beside human actors and lose the charm of the original designs.
-
A few water effects, Kakamora scenes, and stylized sequences impress, but the dominant look is polished yet artificial. Green-screen backgrounds and cartoon creatures frequently lack physical weight.
-
The cast is uneven overall. Catherine Laga’aia and several supporting players bring warmth and presence, while some dialogue delivery feels stiff and Dwayne Johnson often seems restrained.
-
The screenplay preserves a strong underlying story but contributes little invention of its own. Familiar lines, scenes, and structure are reproduced with only modest adjustments.
-
You’re Welcome, Shiny, and a few character exchanges still generate laughs. Heihei and other visual gags often translate poorly, becoming awkward or less charming in the realistic style.
-
Moana’s songs, her bond with Tala, and parts of the finale can still move audiences. Much of the remake, however, feels emotionally muted because it recreates familiar moments without restoring their original spark.
-
At roughly the same length as the original plus a modest extension, the runtime is not excessive on paper. Even so, sluggish middle sections make it feel considerably longer to many viewers.
-
The story follows the 2016 film beat-for-beat with only minor additions. Viewers should expect the same quest, conflicts, twists, and resolution.
-
This is an exceptionally faithful adaptation, preserving nearly every plot beat, song, joke, and character turn. That accuracy will comfort some viewers but is also the main reason others find it redundant.
-
The story still contains moving material, yet the remake often rushes emotional beats or fails to let tense and sad moments breathe. That weakens the sense of stakes.
-
Viewers unfamiliar with the animated film may enjoy the story and songs on their own terms. Longtime fans are much more likely to question why this nearly identical version exists.
-
The lyrics and occasional witty exchanges still land, but much of the spoken dialogue feels copied, stiff, or delivered without enough rhythm and spontaneity.
-
The seafaring set pieces can look large and energetic, especially the Kakamora and ocean encounters. The climax is more divisive, with some finding it spectacular and others seeing noisy, weightless spectacle.
-
The effects range from artful water work and lively stylization to obvious green screen and awkward creature designs. The overall result is technically busy but inconsistent.
-
The story remains accessible, musical, and centered on courage, family, and community. Families new to the material may have fun, though some critics believe children are better served by the more colorful original.
-
Themes of identity, duty, inheritance, courage, ecology, and cultural memory remain meaningful. The remake preserves them but misses opportunities to deepen their relevance for a new decade.
-
As a family fantasy musical, it delivers recognizable songs, adventure, comedy, and a clear heroic journey. It works adequately within the genre but rarely feels fresh or magical.
Cast & Creators
-
CinematographerHis cinematography delivers crisp tropical color, lush scenery, and several beautiful island long shots. The location imagery provides welcome scale when the effects allow it.
-
ComposerHis score supports the adventure with strong Pacific choral textures and gives the finale needed intensity. The music remains closely tied to the film’s emotional appeal.
-
EditorHer editing is credited with maintaining forward momentum in the stronger sections, especially around the musical material. Some broader pacing issues remain elsewhere in the film.
-
TalaShe is one of the most consistently praised performers, giving Tala warmth, mischief, wisdom, and emotional gravity. Her scenes with Moana are frequently described as the film’s most touching.
-
TuiHe gives Chief Tui warmth, dignity, and a grounded parental presence. His work helps the family and village feel credible even when the surrounding effects do not.
-
SinaShe makes the most of a smaller role as Sina, adding warmth and family texture. Her contribution is often praised alongside John Tui’s.
-
Costume DesignerHer costumes are richly detailed, culturally textured, and carefully matched to the animated designs. The work is repeatedly cited as one of the production’s strongest tangible elements.
-
ComposerHis established songs remain a major reason the remake works at all, retaining their melodic and emotional pull. The new end-credits number is generally considered far less memorable.
-
MoanaShe brings a bright, earnest presence, strong vocals, and convincing determination to Moana. Some critics find her constrained by the close imitation of the original performance, but she is widely viewed as a promising lead.
-
TamatoaHis return as Tamatoa remains fun and musically playful, though several critics find the reprise rote and the character’s digital staging less effective than before.
-
DirectorHis direction earns occasional praise for village musical scenes and generosity of spirit, but most reactions describe it as anonymous, stiff, or too dependent on the animated film’s choices.
-
MauiHis charisma still produces a few lively moments, especially during You’re Welcome, but the broader performance is often judged restrained, flat, or less charming than his animated work. The wig and bodysuit further distract from Maui.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in age appropriateness, romance quality, ending satisfaction, near average in soundtrack quality, CGI quality, below average in originality, visual style, realism.
Comparison summary
45 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher13 (29%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts6 (13%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower26 (58%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| originality | 1.1 | 3.5 | -2.4 |
| visual style | 1.8 | 4.1 | -2.4 |
| realism | 1.3 | 3.4 | -2.2 |
| makeup quality | 1.2 | 3.4 | -2.2 |
| plot originality | 1.0 | 3.2 | -2.2 |
| critic appeal | 1.5 | 3.6 | -2.1 |
| directing quality | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
| age appropriateness | 5.0 | 2.9 | +2.1 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better originality
Choose The Furious. It scores 4.8 vs 1.1 for originality, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better visual style
Choose Rose of Nevada. It scores 4.9 vs 1.8 for visual style, with a 4.5 overall score.
If you want better plot originality
Choose Bouchra. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for plot originality, with a 4.3 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
Beauty and the Beast
- Worse: live-action remake execution This Moana is presented as livelier and more successful than Beauty and the Beast.
How to Train Your Dragon
- Worse: runtime expansion Moana adds far less unnecessary runtime than How to Train Your Dragon.
Psycho
- Similar: shot-for-shot faithfulness Its extreme fidelity is compared to the famously literal Psycho remake.
FAQ
Is the live-action Moana worth seeing if I already love the animated film?
It offers strong songs, cultural representation, and several appealing performances, but it follows the original extremely closely. Viewers who want a fresh interpretation are likely to prefer rewatching the animated version.
Are the songs still good?
Yes. The returning soundtrack is the most consistently praised part, especially How Far I’ll Go, We Know the Way, You’re Welcome, and Shiny, though the new end-credits song is less memorable.
How are Catherine Laga’aia and Dwayne Johnson?
Laga’aia is widely praised for her warmth, determination, presence, and singing. Johnson is more divisive, with a few lively musical moments but frequent criticism that his Maui feels restrained and less charming than the animated performance.
Does the CGI look convincing?
Only sometimes. Water effects and a few stylized sequences work, but many critics describe the green-screen environments and hybrid creatures as flat, artificial, or lacking physical weight.
Is it a good family movie?
The story remains accessible, musical, and centered on courage, family, identity, and community. Families new to Moana may enjoy it, while those familiar with the original may find this version less colorful and less magical.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Breakfast All Day movie reviews
- Review score
- 3.8
Article Reviews
the-independent.com
- Review score
- 2.2
chicagotribune.com
- Review score
- 3.5
theglobeandmail.com
Top Movies to Consider
Best for a profound, formally inventive meditation on grief, memory, and the ethics of filming family. Skip it if intensely personal addiction material, a 114-minute runtime, or occasional repetition will...
Pros: plot originality, ending satisfaction
Cons: runtime, pacing
Best for joyful music, rare footage, candid interviews, and a layered Maurice White portrait. Skip it if you want a tightly focused, unconventional reappraisal that lingers on performances instead of...
Pros: ending satisfaction, drama quality
Cons: runtime, originality
Best for a tender, accessible portrait that lets Oliver’s poetry, friends, and archival voice carry the experience. Skip it if you want a brisk, deeply investigative biography; the calm rhythm...
Pros: romance quality, faithfulness to source material
Cons: none
Best for razor-sharp adult comedy, exceptional ensemble work, and a surprisingly moving marriage story. Skip it if talk-heavy chamber pieces, explicit relationship discussions, or an occasionally intrusive string score wear...
Pros: plot originality, lead performance
Cons: runtime, score quality