Rivals, Season 2

Rivals, Season 2 Feature Scores

Explore all 49 feature scores for Rivals, Season 2, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

49 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    24 (49%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    16 (33%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (18%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The comedy ranges from sharp dialogue to full physical farce, with many critics highlighting the season’s relentless laughs and eccentric English silliness.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    acting quality: 4.6, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The ensemble is widely praised for committing fully to the show’s heightened tone while keeping its characters human. One sharply negative take found some performances embarrassed by the material.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    main cast performance: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The leads bring swagger, menace, vulnerability, romance, and comic warmth to an intentionally exaggerated world. David Tennant and Alex Hassell receive especially strong praise.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    production design: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Lavish estates, pastel pools, polo fields, television studios, and tactile period details create an immersive, affluent 1980s world.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    renewal interest: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Enthusiasm for more episodes is very high, with several critics eager for the second half and a future season.
  • 4.3
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    character development: 4.3, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Rupert, Monica, Maud, Taggie, Sarah, and several supporting women receive richer, more mature arcs. The season is strongest when it lets the glamorous surface give way to vulnerability and consequence.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    episode structure: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Large comic set pieces, interlocking secrets, and multiple revelations are handled with impressive control, particularly in the dinner-party episode.
  • 4.2
    11 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 4.2, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Most critics find the season irresistibly funny, glamorous, and addictive. A small minority sees the same excess as vapid, exhausting, or empty.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The expanded ensemble is a major strength, with Claire Rushbrook, Emily Atack, Lisa McGrillis, Bella Maclean, and others turning quieter roles into memorable highlights.
  • 4.3
    7 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.3, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Beneath the glossy debauchery, the season explores class, power, sexism, hidden sexuality, loyalty, consequences, and the fragility of love.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    critic appeal: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The season drew overwhelmingly enthusiastic notices, including several maximum-score reactions and claims that it improves on the first season.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The strongest romantic pairings feel unexpectedly tender and emotionally charged, especially Lizzie and Freddie and the scenes between Rupert and Taggie.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The dialogue is consistently witty, cheeky, and packed with knowingly outrageous period jokes.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    costume design: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Big hair, crushed velvet, bright florals, and deliberately tacky fashion make the 1980s setting vivid, funny, and instantly recognizable.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to source material: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The adaptation preserves Jilly Cooper’s wit, sensuality, class satire, and larger-than-life characters while making thoughtful modernizing changes.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 4.1, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The season is widely regarded as a confident, richer continuation that adds darker consequences and more complex relationships. A few critics find it looser or less substantial.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Carefully chosen 1980s songs reinforce the period, sharpen jokes, and heighten romance and conflict.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    world-building: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Rutshire feels expansive and lived-in, with interlocking homes, companies, political circles, and social hierarchies that support the sprawling ensemble.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    As a glossy bonkbuster and heightened prime-time soap, the season delivers sex, scandal, comedy, romance, and melodrama with confidence.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    writing quality: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The writing successfully juggles comedy, melodrama, romance, satire, and character depth. Occasional overcrowding and rushed subplots are the main weaknesses.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    audience appeal: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    This is exuberant grown-up escapism for viewers who enjoy glamorous soap, broad comedy, and unapologetic excess.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    bingeability: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The tangled romances and escalating feuds are highly compulsive. The fragmented release schedule makes the season less satisfying to consume week by week.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    drama quality: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The corporate feud, affairs, betrayals, and emotional fallout create rich soapy drama without abandoning the show’s playful tone.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot twists: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reversals, betrayals, scandals, and romantic shifts remain juicy and frequently jaw-dropping.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    modern political framing: 4.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The 1987 election, class hierarchy, workplace sexism, and Thatcher-era prejudice add context and sharper stakes, though the satire can remain soft.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    score quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The playful operatic vocal score gives the show a distinctive comic voice that comments on the onscreen excess.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    emotional impact: 3.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Greater vulnerability and consequence give the season more heart, especially in its romances and family conflicts. Monica’s death lands as anger and disappointment rather than satisfying tragedy.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    visual style: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The hyper-saturated palette, sweeping countryside, playful camerawork, and extravagant interiors create a bold look, though some flourishes can be too much.
  • 3.5
    5 reviews low consensus
    cultural representation: 3.5, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The show gives women and marginalized characters more space while engaging with period sexism and homophobia. Monica’s death is a major exception, criticized as a dated queer-character trope.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    directing quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The best set pieces, especially the crowded dinner-party farce, are staged with precise comic timing and escalating visual chaos.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    lore depth: 4.5, 1 review
    Rutshire expands beyond the central feud, adding new histories, families, social layers, and links to other Cooper stories.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    media scrutiny portrayal: 4.5, 1 review
    Rupert’s public destruction shows how scandal, broadcasting, and political image can be weaponized to dismantle a person’s career and relationships.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    plot originality: 4.5, 1 review
    Its unusual blend of 1980s broadcasting politics, country-house soap, sexual farce, and social commentary gives the series a distinctive identity.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    season length: 4.5, 1 review
    The expanded episode order gives the story more room to deepen characters and broaden Rutshire beyond the first season.
  • 3.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    realism: 3.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The show is knowingly cartoonish and occasionally implausible, but most critics see that unreality as part of its charm rather than a flaw.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    cinematography: 4.0, 1 review
    Inventive camera movement and bold compositions add energy and emotional emphasis. A few flourishes are so obvious that they feel heavy-handed.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    continuity: 4.0, 1 review
    Season 2 resumes the established feuds, romances, and Rutshire tone smoothly, making the expanded story feel like a confident continuation.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    franchise connection: 4.0, 1 review
    Hints from the wider Rutshire Chronicles suggest an appealing path toward a broader Jilly Cooper television universe.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    screenplay quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The scripts balance sharp dialogue, eccentric jokes, emotional turns, and complicated ensemble plotting with considerable skill.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    suspense: 4.0, 1 review
    Escalating revenge, political scandal, and unresolved relationships keep the season tense and leave viewers eager for the remaining episodes.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    plot clarity: 2.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The many affairs, business loyalties, family histories, and new characters can be difficult to track. The central Tony-Rupert-Cameron conflict remains clear enough to anchor the chaos.
  • 2.8
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    season pacing: 2.8, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Story momentum is generally strong, but the hybrid weekly and split-season release pattern is repeatedly criticized as confusing and frustrating.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    character consistency: 2.5, 1 review
    Most characters retain recognizable flaws while gaining depth, though Taggie’s repeated pining can feel tiresome and overly static.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    accent authenticity: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Hayley Atwell fits Helen well, but her American accent is inconsistent and occasionally slips.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cliffhanger effectiveness: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The season creates strong anticipation and memorable shocks, but Monica’s episode-six ending is criticized as harmful and dramatically unjustified.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    episode pacing: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The central rivalry moves well, but some secondary relationships are rushed or denied enough screen time.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    editing quality: 3.0, 1 review
    Most scenes move briskly, but one ambitious dinner-party sequence interrupts its own rhythm with distracting asides.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    accountability handling: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The season generally deepens its moral stakes by making selfish choices carry consequences. Monica’s abrupt death, however, is criticized for cutting off her agency rather than completing her arc.
  • 3.4
    9 reviews low consensus
    sexual content level: 3.4, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The abundant sex and nudity are central to the show’s comic identity and are often embraced as part of the fun. Some critics find the excess tiring, while others miss the first season’s freer erotic energy.