Review: Roomba i5+ Combo Robot Vacuum and Mop

3.2
Based on methodology below
100
Insights analyzed
40
Grouped by key features
7
From expert reviews
Scores below reflect consolidated expert coverage across these features.
Bottom Line

Choose the Roomba Combo i5+ for easy self-emptying and carpet-first cleaning; Skip if you expect dependable mopping or advanced obstacle avoidance.

Best for

Busy households with mostly carpet (and/or pets) that want hands-off self-emptying and quick room-by-room cleans through the app or voice assistants.

Not for

Hard-floor-heavy homes counting on true mopping, or anyone who needs reliable obstacle avoidance and granular no-go/keep-out zones.

Verdict

Roomba Combo i5+ is at its best as a self-emptying, carpet-leaning robot for people who want simple automation and iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller cleaning. Room-based mapping and voice control make quick touch-ups easy, and the base can store weeks of debris. The tradeoff is that the mopping system is a light-maintenance wipe with a small tank and few controls, and several reviewers noted finicky wet-bin behavior. Navigation and obstacle handling are also less advanced than camera or LiDAR bots, so you’ll do more pre-tidying and may see longer, bumpier runs.

Pros

  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    Packaging quality: 4.8, based on 1 review
    Unboxing experiences are positive, with well-organized packaging and clear documentation noted.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    Cord management: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The clean base is noted to have built-in cable-routing channels to help it sit flush to a wall and keep cords tidy.
  • 4.4
    based on 4 reviews
    Assembly and Setup: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
    Most reviews describe straightforward unboxing and fast app pairing, with minimal friction to get cleaning.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Hard-floor tests and owner reports suggest strong pickup of fine debris like flour and dust, with vacuuming doing more of the work than the mop.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Reviews commonly report good intake of crumbs and larger debris on hard floors, especially in vacuum-only mode.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Aesthetic design and finish: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Several reviewers like the two-tone textures and fabric-style top accents, and the clean base design is generally seen as modern and unobtrusive.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    Accessories and Tools: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Kits commonly include interchangeable bins, a microfiber mop pad, and spare consumables like extra bags or filters depending on the package.
  • 4.1
    based on 3 reviews
    Price and Value: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
    Value looks strong when discounted, but at typical pricing the tradeoffs in mopping reliability and navigation features make some competitors more compelling.
  • 4.1
    based on 4 reviews
    Ease of use: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
    Day-to-day usability is a recurring pro thanks to self-emptying, scheduling, and simple controls, but the mop workflow (bin swap, pad care) adds friction.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    The dual rubber rollers reduce performance loss from hair tangles, but hair still collects at roller ends and on the side brush and needs periodic clearing.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Users generally report good day-to-day pickup of light pet hair on hard floors, especially when run frequently.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 4.0, based on 1 review
    Bagged self-emptying adds recurring costs, but bags are often described as lasting weeks (up to around 60 days) so annual cost can be modest; brushes and filters may add extra upkeep.
  • 3.8
    based on 3 reviews
    Pet-Ready Features: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
    Dual rubber rollers and self-emptying reduce hands-on pet-hair cleanup, but the i5+ lacks camera-based pet-waste avoidance, so homes with pets still need pre-tidying.
  • 3.8
    based on 1 review
    Low-profile design: 3.8, based on 1 review
    At roughly 3.6 inches tall, it is average for modern robots and fits under many, but not all, low-clearance furniture pieces.
  • 3.8
    based on 1 review
    Under-Furniture Pickup: 3.8, based on 1 review
    Average robot height enables reasonable under-furniture reach for routine dusting, though it will not match ultra-low models.
  • 3.7
    based on 5 reviews
    Bin and Bag: 3.7, based on 5 reviews
    The i5+ uses a self-emptying bagged base plus interchangeable bins for vacuum-only vs vacuum-and-mop. Convenience is high, but wet-bin misdetection can contaminate the bag in worst cases.
  • 3.7
    based on 2 reviews
    Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
    Results vary by reviewer: a controlled comparison measured below-average pickup on carpet, while other reviewers describe excellent carpet cleaning speed and finish.
  • 3.7
    based on 2 reviews
    Software-update support / feature longevity: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
    One reviewer highlights iRobot’s focus on ongoing software updates, though the i5+ platform remains feature-limited compared with higher-end Roombas.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    Suction and Airflow: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Measured airflow is described as modest in one review, but iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller system is repeatedly credited with strong real-world pickup on carpet and hard floors.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    Child lock: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Mentioned as an available safety feature, though the included reviews do not deeply test it in real households.
  • 3.5
    based on 5 reviews
    Controls and UI: 3.5, based on 5 reviews
    Setup and pairing are widely described as easy and the app is simple to use, but advanced controls are limited (e.g., fewer zone/barrier options) and at least one review reported buggy map behavior.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 6 reviews
    Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 3.4, based on 6 reviews
    The base is a major convenience and often works well, but multiple reviews flag failure modes such as poor dense-debris clearing and wet-bin misdetection that can soak the bag/dock.
  • 3.2
    based on 6 reviews
    AI, Smart, App and Automation: 3.2, based on 6 reviews
    Scheduling, room cleaning, and voice control are highlights, but the i5+ lacks advanced automation found on higher-end models (such as robust keep-out zones or vision-based avoidance) and some users report map/app quirks.
  • 3.2
    based on 6 reviews
    Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 3.2, based on 6 reviews
    It supports room-based cleaning after learning a map, but efficiency can be weaker than LiDAR bots; one test showed notably longer runs and less confident coverage.
  • 3.0
    based on 3 reviews
    Area Rug Handling: 3.0, based on 3 reviews
    With the mop bin installed, the robot cannot intelligently avoid rugs, so rug-heavy homes may need manual blocking. As a vacuum, it can traverse typical rugs using its large wheels.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Battery and Charging: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Recharge-and-resume is repeatedly referenced, but reported runtimes vary; efficiency can lag behind faster LiDAR robots on whole-home runs.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Noise level: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Cleaning noise is described as typical, but the robot can be loud when bumping into objects and the base’s emptying cycle is often called a jet-engine-like burst.
  • 3.0
    based on 2 reviews
    Water tank: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
    Reported tank sizes are small-to-middling for a combo robot, suitable for light maintenance passes rather than large-area wet cleaning.
  • 2.8
    based on 1 review
    Dock noise: 2.8, based on 1 review
    Auto-emptying is frequently described as very loud, but usually only for a short burst per empty cycle.
  • 2.7
    based on 2 reviews
    Maintenance requirements: 2.7, based on 2 reviews
    Expect regular upkeep: side-brush hair removal, periodic filter changes, mop-pad washing, and occasional brush replacement; some owners report quicker side-brush wear.
  • 2.5
    based on 6 reviews
    Mopping performance: 2.5, based on 6 reviews
    Consistently framed as a light, damp-wipe system for day-to-day maintenance. It is not a deep scrubber, and at least one review reports the wet mode failing due to bin detection issues.
  • 2.2
    based on 1 review
    Build quality and durability: 2.2, based on 1 review
    Durability feedback is mixed: some users report broken side brushes within weeks, while others note solid day-to-day operation aside from cosmetic scuffs from bumping.
  • 2.2
    based on 1 review
    Comparative performance: 2.2, based on 1 review
    In a sub-$400 comparison, the i5+ scored poorly on carpet pickup and especially on dense-debris auto-emptying versus LiDAR competitors, though other reviewers still liked its carpet results in daily use.
  • 2.2
    based on 1 review
    Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot): 2.2, based on 1 review
    Edge work is more bump-driven than precision-guided; some reviewers note clumsy wall interactions and potential scuffs compared with LiDAR or camera bots.
  • 1.9
    based on 3 reviews
    Solution / Liquid system: 1.9, based on 3 reviews
    The liquid system is basic with limited control (often described as gravity-fed) and no auto-refill; wet-bin auto-detection can be finicky, with some reports of messy failures.
  • 1.8
    based on 1 review
    Hair Pickup — Carpets: 1.8, based on 1 review
    Hair pickup on carpet is inconsistent: one test found it left the most long hair behind, while other reviewers emphasize strong pet-hair handling overall.
  • 1.8
    based on 4 reviews
    Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 1.8, based on 4 reviews
    Obstacle avoidance is limited without a front camera: tests show poor cord and pet-waste avoidance, though cliff sensors help prevent falls on stairs.
  • 1.5
    based on 1 review
    Odor control: 1.5, based on 1 review
    Dry debris generally stays contained in the bagged base, but a reported wet-bin emptying mishap led to lingering odor for one owner.
  • 1.4
    based on 2 reviews
    Emptying and Mess Control: 1.4, based on 2 reviews
    Self-emptying is convenient, but dense debris can be left behind in the robot bin in some tests, and wet-bin emptying mistakes can create mess and odor.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Mop lifting system: 1.0, based on 1 review
    The i5+ does not have an auto-lifting mop; it relies on swapping in a mop bin, which limits carpet safety and automation.

FAQ

Does it clean carpet well?

Opinions are split: some reviewers reported very fast, thorough carpet cleaning with visible vacuum lines, while one budget-bot comparison test placed its carpet pickup near the bottom of the group. If carpet is your priority, expect solid results but not class-leading performance for the price.

Is the mopping function a real replacement for mopping?

No. Across reviews it behaves more like a damp maintenance wipe for dust, crumbs, and small spills. It struggles with sticky or ground-in messes, and at least one reviewer reported the wet-bin mode was unreliable.

Will it avoid cords, clutter, or pet waste?

Not reliably. Multiple reviews note the i5+ lacks camera-based obstacle avoidance and can plow into cords or problematic items, so you will need to pre-tidy and block off risky areas before runs.

How loud is it in daily use?

During regular cleaning it is in the typical robot-vac range, but the auto-empty cycle is often described as very loud for a short burst (around 10 seconds).

How often do you deal with bags, filters, and brush maintenance?

The self-empty bag is commonly described as lasting up to about 60 days depending on debris and pets, but you will still need to clean hair from the side brush and periodically replace filters and brushes. Some owners reported faster-than-expected side-brush wear.

What are these scores based on?

They are derived from the full text of the supplied review transcripts for this product.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

#1
4.5
Choose the Roborock Qrevo Curv for a low-touch vacuum+mop that cleans edges/corners well and clears thresholds better than most. Skip if you have...
#2
4.3
Choose Saros 10R for a low-profile, highly automated vacuum/mop that minimizes hair tangles and dock upkeep; Skip it if you need a lower-priced...
#3
4.3
Choose Saros 10 if you want a slim, premium robot that vacuums hard, climbs thresholds, and runs a truly hands-off dock. Skip it...
#4
4.3
Choose the Dreame X50 Ultra for powerful all‑around cleaning with standout step/threshold climbing and low‑tangle brushes; Skip it if you need consistently perfect...
#5
4.3
Choose the J15 Ultra if edge mopping and hot-water pad washing matter more than flagship polish; Skip if you want the very best...
#6
4.3
Choose if you want a hands-off flagship that's strong on carpets, edge coverage, and mop-lift to protect rugs. Skip if you're price-sensitive or...
#7
4.3
Choose the Deebot X9 Pro Omni if you want best-in-class mopping with strong vacuuming in one mostly hands-off system. Skip it if you...
#8
4.3
Choose the Yeedi S14 Plus if you want flagship-level mopping and strong suction for less than most premium bots. Skip it if you...