-
4.8
based on 1 review
Packaging quality: 4.8, based on 1 review
Unboxing experiences are positive, with well-organized packaging and clear documentation noted.
-
4.5
based on 1 review
Cord management: 4.5, based on 1 review
The clean base is noted to have built-in cable-routing channels to help it sit flush to a wall and keep cords tidy.
-
4.4
based on 4 reviews
Assembly and Setup: 4.4, based on 4 reviews
Most reviews describe straightforward unboxing and fast app pairing, with minimal friction to get cleaning.
-
4.3
based on 3 reviews
Hard Floor — Fine Dust Pickup: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
Hard-floor tests and owner reports suggest strong pickup of fine debris like flour and dust, with vacuuming doing more of the work than the mop.
-
4.3
based on 3 reviews
Hard Floor — Large Debris Intake: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
Reviews commonly report good intake of crumbs and larger debris on hard floors, especially in vacuum-only mode.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Aesthetic design and finish: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Several reviewers like the two-tone textures and fabric-style top accents, and the clean base design is generally seen as modern and unobtrusive.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Accessories and Tools: 4.2, based on 1 review
Kits commonly include interchangeable bins, a microfiber mop pad, and spare consumables like extra bags or filters depending on the package.
-
4.1
based on 3 reviews
Price and Value: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
Value looks strong when discounted, but at typical pricing the tradeoffs in mopping reliability and navigation features make some competitors more compelling.
-
4.1
based on 4 reviews
Ease of use: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
Day-to-day usability is a recurring pro thanks to self-emptying, scheduling, and simple controls, but the mop workflow (bin swap, pad care) adds friction.
-
4.0
based on 3 reviews
Hair‑Wrap / Tangle Resistance: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
The dual rubber rollers reduce performance loss from hair tangles, but hair still collects at roller ends and on the side brush and needs periodic clearing.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Hair Pickup — Hard Floors: 4.0, based on 1 review
Users generally report good day-to-day pickup of light pet hair on hard floors, especially when run frequently.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Ongoing ownership costs (bags, filters, batteries): 4.0, based on 1 review
Bagged self-emptying adds recurring costs, but bags are often described as lasting weeks (up to around 60 days) so annual cost can be modest; brushes and filters may add extra upkeep.
-
3.8
based on 3 reviews
Pet-Ready Features: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
Dual rubber rollers and self-emptying reduce hands-on pet-hair cleanup, but the i5+ lacks camera-based pet-waste avoidance, so homes with pets still need pre-tidying.
-
3.8
based on 1 review
Low-profile design: 3.8, based on 1 review
At roughly 3.6 inches tall, it is average for modern robots and fits under many, but not all, low-clearance furniture pieces.
-
3.8
based on 1 review
Under-Furniture Pickup: 3.8, based on 1 review
Average robot height enables reasonable under-furniture reach for routine dusting, though it will not match ultra-low models.
-
3.7
based on 5 reviews
Bin and Bag: 3.7, based on 5 reviews
The i5+ uses a self-emptying bagged base plus interchangeable bins for vacuum-only vs vacuum-and-mop. Convenience is high, but wet-bin misdetection can contaminate the bag in worst cases.
-
3.7
based on 2 reviews
Carpet — Medium-Pile Pickup: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
Results vary by reviewer: a controlled comparison measured below-average pickup on carpet, while other reviewers describe excellent carpet cleaning speed and finish.
-
3.7
based on 2 reviews
Software-update support / feature longevity: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
One reviewer highlights iRobot’s focus on ongoing software updates, though the i5+ platform remains feature-limited compared with higher-end Roombas.
-
3.5
based on 2 reviews
Suction and Airflow: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
Measured airflow is described as modest in one review, but iRobot’s dual-rubber-roller system is repeatedly credited with strong real-world pickup on carpet and hard floors.
-
3.5
based on 1 review
Child lock: 3.5, based on 1 review
Mentioned as an available safety feature, though the included reviews do not deeply test it in real households.
-
3.5
based on 5 reviews
Controls and UI: 3.5, based on 5 reviews
Setup and pairing are widely described as easy and the app is simple to use, but advanced controls are limited (e.g., fewer zone/barrier options) and at least one review reported buggy map behavior.
-
3.4
based on 6 reviews
Docking and Auto-Empty Reliability (Robot): 3.4, based on 6 reviews
The base is a major convenience and often works well, but multiple reviews flag failure modes such as poor dense-debris clearing and wet-bin misdetection that can soak the bag/dock.
-
3.2
based on 6 reviews
AI, Smart, App and Automation: 3.2, based on 6 reviews
Scheduling, room cleaning, and voice control are highlights, but the i5+ lacks advanced automation found on higher-end models (such as robust keep-out zones or vision-based avoidance) and some users report map/app quirks.
-
3.2
based on 6 reviews
Map and Path Efficiency (Robot Vacuums): 3.2, based on 6 reviews
It supports room-based cleaning after learning a map, but efficiency can be weaker than LiDAR bots; one test showed notably longer runs and less confident coverage.
-
3.0
based on 3 reviews
Area Rug Handling: 3.0, based on 3 reviews
With the mop bin installed, the robot cannot intelligently avoid rugs, so rug-heavy homes may need manual blocking. As a vacuum, it can traverse typical rugs using its large wheels.
-
3.0
based on 2 reviews
Battery and Charging: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
Recharge-and-resume is repeatedly referenced, but reported runtimes vary; efficiency can lag behind faster LiDAR robots on whole-home runs.
-
3.0
based on 2 reviews
Noise level: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
Cleaning noise is described as typical, but the robot can be loud when bumping into objects and the base’s emptying cycle is often called a jet-engine-like burst.
-
3.0
based on 2 reviews
Water tank: 3.0, based on 2 reviews
Reported tank sizes are small-to-middling for a combo robot, suitable for light maintenance passes rather than large-area wet cleaning.
-
2.8
based on 1 review
Dock noise: 2.8, based on 1 review
Auto-emptying is frequently described as very loud, but usually only for a short burst per empty cycle.
-
2.7
based on 2 reviews
Maintenance requirements: 2.7, based on 2 reviews
Expect regular upkeep: side-brush hair removal, periodic filter changes, mop-pad washing, and occasional brush replacement; some owners report quicker side-brush wear.
-
2.5
based on 6 reviews
Mopping performance: 2.5, based on 6 reviews
Consistently framed as a light, damp-wipe system for day-to-day maintenance. It is not a deep scrubber, and at least one review reports the wet mode failing due to bin detection issues.
-
2.2
based on 1 review
Build quality and durability: 2.2, based on 1 review
Durability feedback is mixed: some users report broken side brushes within weeks, while others note solid day-to-day operation aside from cosmetic scuffs from bumping.
-
2.2
based on 1 review
Comparative performance: 2.2, based on 1 review
In a sub-$400 comparison, the i5+ scored poorly on carpet pickup and especially on dense-debris auto-emptying versus LiDAR competitors, though other reviewers still liked its carpet results in daily use.
-
2.2
based on 1 review
Edge‑Following Accuracy (Robot): 2.2, based on 1 review
Edge work is more bump-driven than precision-guided; some reviewers note clumsy wall interactions and potential scuffs compared with LiDAR or camera bots.
-
1.9
based on 3 reviews
Solution / Liquid system: 1.9, based on 3 reviews
The liquid system is basic with limited control (often described as gravity-fed) and no auto-refill; wet-bin auto-detection can be finicky, with some reports of messy failures.
-
1.8
based on 1 review
Hair Pickup — Carpets: 1.8, based on 1 review
Hair pickup on carpet is inconsistent: one test found it left the most long hair behind, while other reviewers emphasize strong pet-hair handling overall.
-
1.8
based on 4 reviews
Obstacle Avoidance (Robot): 1.8, based on 4 reviews
Obstacle avoidance is limited without a front camera: tests show poor cord and pet-waste avoidance, though cliff sensors help prevent falls on stairs.
-
1.5
based on 1 review
Odor control: 1.5, based on 1 review
Dry debris generally stays contained in the bagged base, but a reported wet-bin emptying mishap led to lingering odor for one owner.
-
1.4
based on 2 reviews
Emptying and Mess Control: 1.4, based on 2 reviews
Self-emptying is convenient, but dense debris can be left behind in the robot bin in some tests, and wet-bin emptying mistakes can create mess and odor.
-
1.0
based on 1 review
Mop lifting system: 1.0, based on 1 review
The i5+ does not have an auto-lifting mop; it relies on swapping in a mop bin, which limits carpet safety and automation.