-
5.0
based on 14 reviews
Hub requirement: 5.0, based on 14 reviews
Multiple reviewers praise that Encode connects directly to Wi-Fi with no bridge or hub, which simplifies setup and ongoing use compared with add-on adapters.
-
4.8
based on 6 reviews
Physical attack resistance: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
Encode’s ANSI/BHMA Grade 1 ratings are repeatedly cited as a major advantage, with reviewers framing it as unusually robust for a consumer smart lock and better than typical Grade 2 options.
-
4.7
based on 1 review
Security features (encryption): 4.7, based on 1 review
Security discussions highlight encrypted wireless communication (especially over Bluetooth in locksmith-focused reviews) and the importance of PIN requirements for sensitive actions like voice unlocking.
-
4.7
based on 2 reviews
Finish durability: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
Finish options and styling are often praised, and some sources cite top-grade finish ratings; most feedback suggests the exterior holds up well, with limited long-term wear data in the reviewed set.
-
4.6
based on 2 reviews
Warranty and support: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
Warranty expectations are generally positive, with specific mentions of multi-year electronics coverage and long mechanical coverage; support feedback is limited, but locksmith sources note brand familiarity and serviceability.
-
4.6
based on 1 review
Existing hardware reuse: 4.6, based on 1 review
Encode is a full deadbolt replacement but reuses standard door prep (common holes and latch dimensions), so most users do not need door modifications unless their existing setup is nonstandard or misaligned.
-
4.6
based on 13 reviews
Keypad: 4.6, based on 13 reviews
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Locking reliability: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
Overall locking reliability is rated highly once installed and calibrated, with stable schedules and consistent app/keypad performance; most issues cluster around setup confusion and Wi-Fi signal quality, not day-to-day locking.
-
4.5
based on 17 reviews
Guest Codes and Access: 4.5, based on 17 reviews
Encode supports up to about 100 user PINs plus temporary or recurring schedules, making it well-suited for families, guests, and service providers without handing out physical keys.
-
4.5
based on 3 reviews
Backset compatibility: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
Backset support is reported for common 2-3/8 inch and 2-3/4 inch configurations via an adjustable latch, covering typical residential doors; uncommon backsets may require different hardware.
-
4.5
based on 14 reviews
Remote access: 4.5, based on 14 reviews
Remote lock/unlock and status checks work well once connected, with occasional delays reported when commands travel through cloud integrations or Wi-Fi conditions are poor.
-
4.5
based on 6 reviews
Build quality and durability: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
Build quality is consistently described as sturdy, heavy, and premium, with special praise for the exterior hardware; a few critiques focus on the bulky interior housing and plastic battery compartment aesthetics rather than durability.
-
4.4
based on 14 reviews
Wi-Fi: 4.4, based on 14 reviews
Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi enables true remote control from anywhere; performance is generally reliable, though some users note occasional lag or weaker connections if the router signal is marginal.
-
4.4
based on 12 reviews
Installation and Setup: 4.4, based on 12 reviews
Installation is usually quick with a screwdriver and standard deadbolt holes; the snap-in/faceplate design helps one-person installs, but a few testers found alignment or juggling parts tricky on certain doors.
-
4.4
based on 3 reviews
Lock/unlock speed: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
Unlocking via code or app is usually near-instant, and the keypad response is praised; a few sources mention remote actions can take longer to reflect in the app due to cloud latency.
-
4.4
based on 9 reviews
User access management: 4.4, based on 9 reviews
User management is a standout: reviewers mention per-user schedules, easy creation/deletion of codes, optional virtual keys for app-based users, and role-like admin control through master codes.
-
4.4
based on 1 review
Weather resistance: 4.4, based on 1 review
Weather resistance is generally treated as adequate for exterior use, with weatherproof keypad assemblies noted in at least one detailed spec-focused review.
-
4.4
based on 16 reviews
Access logs: 4.4, based on 16 reviews
Activity history is consistently highlighted as useful and detailed, showing who locked/unlocked, when it happened, and which method was used, with logs available without a subscription in most discussions.
-
4.4
based on 9 reviews
Key override reliability: 4.4, based on 9 reviews
Physical key override is valued as a reliable fallback for dead batteries or connectivity issues; some reviewers note only one key is included, but the cylinder is easy to rekey or match to a home.
-
4.4
based on 8 reviews
Touchscreen: 4.4, based on 8 reviews
Touch interface is generally responsive and designed to reduce visible smudge patterns; several reviewers note it is not a phone-like glass touchscreen but works reliably in varied conditions.
-
4.3
based on 13 reviews
Auto-lock: 4.3, based on 13 reviews
Auto-lock is frequently praised for preventing forgotten locks, with adjustable delays from seconds to minutes; a minority caution that auto-lock can be annoying if the door is often opened/closed rapidly or if alignment causes bolt contact.
-
4.3
based on 15 reviews
App: 4.3, based on 15 reviews
Schlage Home app is widely described as straightforward for everyday locking, code management, schedules, and history; the main complaints are onboarding confusion when pairing with third-party ecosystems or needing multiple apps for Amazon Key/Ring use.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Auto-relock after failed attempts: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
After multiple invalid code attempts, the lock can temporarily disable keypad entry to slow brute-force guessing; this protection is noted as effective, though alerts about the event may be more visible in logs than as real-time notifications.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Bluetooth: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Bluetooth is mentioned as a local fallback and pairing method, helping nearby control even when the internet is down; locksmith reviews call out modern, encrypted Bluetooth as a positive differentiator.
-
4.3
based on 2 reviews
Pick/drill resistance (if rated): 4.3, based on 2 reviews
Several reviews point to strong resistance to common attacks and high-grade hardware, though most do not provide formal drill/pick test results; locksmith commentary suggests the cylinder is solid but not invulnerable and can be upgraded if desired.
-
4.2
based on 14 reviews
Notifications: 4.2, based on 14 reviews
Notifications are generally responsive and configurable (including per-user alerts), but at least one reviewer notes that certain security events such as repeated wrong-code attempts may appear in history without an immediate push alert.
-
4.2
based on 4 reviews
Door compatibility (deadbolt fit): 4.2, based on 4 reviews
Door fit is largely standard for deadbolt replacements, though some installers needed to adjust strike alignment or manage a tight cable path; once aligned, operation is smooth even on slightly imperfect doors.
-
4.2
based on 1 review
Keyway quality: 4.2, based on 1 review
Keyway/cylinder quality is seen as solid and serviceable, with locksmith reviewers noting standard Schlage keyways and straightforward rekeying; ultimate high-security upgrades are possible for those who want them.
-
4.2
based on 5 reviews
Tamper detection sensitivity: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
Tamper/forced-entry detection is available and sometimes adjustable in the app; it is treated as a useful deterrent, but real-world sensitivity and false-alarm rates are not uniformly tested across reviews.
-
4.1
based on 8 reviews
Voice control: 4.1, based on 8 reviews
Voice control is convenient for locking and status checks, and Alexa can unlock with a required voice PIN; Google Assistant is commonly reported as more limited, and voice actions can show mild latency.
-
4.0
based on 10 reviews
Value and Price: 4.0, based on 10 reviews
Value is debated: many feel the hub-free Wi-Fi convenience and high security rating justify the premium, while others consider it expensive versus competitors, especially given missing HomeKit/geofencing and the need to replace AA batteries more often.
-
4.0
based on 7 reviews
Alarm/siren loudness (if included): 4.0, based on 7 reviews
The built-in alarm exists on most configurations, but reviewers disagree on loudness: some call it very loud or irritating, while at least one source describes it as relatively quiet in practice.
-
4.0
based on 4 reviews
Feature additions via updates: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
Firmware or feature updates are referenced mainly during setup, with some users noting initial update friction; once updated, the lock generally runs smoothly and app features remain stable.
-
4.0
based on 10 reviews
Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 4.0, based on 10 reviews
Integrations are strongest with Alexa, Google Assistant, Amazon Key, and select Ring doorbells/cameras; repeated drawbacks are no Apple HomeKit on this model, limited Google capabilities, no IFTTT/SmartThings, and known Ring Alarm limitations.
-
4.0
based on 4 reviews
Locking motor: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
Motor strength and reliability are praised for handling slight door misalignment, but multiple reviewers complain the motor can be loud or grinding, especially from the interior side.
-
3.6
based on 9 reviews
Battery: 3.6, based on 9 reviews
Battery life is commonly estimated around six months for Wi-Fi use, with real-world reports ranging from better-than-expected to shorter than some non-Wi-Fi models; most agree Wi-Fi convenience comes with more frequent AA changes.