-
4.6
based on 2 reviews
Security features (encryption): 4.6, based on 2 reviews
Security notes include locally stored fingerprints protected with AES encryption, multi-layer encryption for app/account data, and restrictions that require local Bluetooth for certain sensitive setting changes.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Two-factor authentication availability: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
Two-factor authentication and account verification (email/phone codes) are highlighted as strong protections in several reviews, helping reduce the risk of unauthorized remote control.
-
4.4
based on 2 reviews
Lock/unlock speed: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
Lock/unlock speed is generally snappy via code and Bluetooth, while app actions over Wi-Fi can add a few seconds; fingerprint models (when functioning well) are near-instant and feel fastest day-to-day.
-
4.3
based on 14 reviews
Guest Codes and Access: 4.3, based on 14 reviews
Guest codes are a standout: reviewers highlight easy sharing plus temporary and recurring schedules; capacity is sometimes cited as 250 codes while other reviews describe effectively unlimited code creation depending on setup.
-
4.3
based on 5 reviews
Feature additions via updates: 4.3, based on 5 reviews
Updates and modular add-ons are central to the product strategy: reviewers cite bug fixes via firmware and the ability to swap Wi-Fi/Z-Wave/Zigbee modules with Matter support discussed as a future upgrade path.
-
4.3
based on 3 reviews
Weather resistance: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
Weather tolerance is presented as strong, with reviewers citing operation in very cold conditions and wide stated temperature ranges; the exterior touchscreen/keypad generally holds up in real use, though environment-specific readability (sun glare) can be an issue.
-
4.3
based on 11 reviews
Access logs: 4.3, based on 11 reviews
Access logs are consistently praised, offering a clear timeline of lock/unlock events by method and user, and become more informative when DoorSense is installed to add door-open/closed events.
-
4.2
based on 14 reviews
User access management: 4.2, based on 14 reviews
User access management is straightforward, typically distinguishing owners from guests and allowing either full app access or limited entry methods, making it practical for families and shared homes.
-
4.2
based on 9 reviews
Build quality and durability: 4.2, based on 9 reviews
Build quality is generally regarded as solid and premium-looking, often paired with BHMA/Grade 2 positioning and a smaller interior footprint, though a few reviewers note the interior feels lighter or that finishes can scuff during a fussy install.
-
4.2
based on 8 reviews
Locking reliability: 4.2, based on 8 reviews
Core locking is mostly dependable, but some reviewers experienced intermittent app connectivity, Wi-Fi reconnect notices, calibration problems, or automation quirks that can undermine confidence if you expect set-and-forget behavior.
-
4.2
based on 2 reviews
Locking motor: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
The motor action is typically described as smooth and sometimes quiet, with configurable sounds/volume; a few users like the audible confirmation, while others prefer quieter operation.
-
4.1
based on 16 reviews
Smart-home integration (Alexa, Google, Siri, HomeKit, Matter, Thread): 4.1, based on 16 reviews
Ecosystem support is a strength when paired with the appropriate module, spanning HomeKit and (with Wi-Fi) Alexa/Google and other platforms; however, many variants lack Apple Home Key, and some users report platform-specific limitations like Google routines gaps or PIN-required voice unlocking.
-
4.1
based on 6 reviews
Physical attack resistance: 4.1, based on 6 reviews
Reviewers generally feel confident in the physical security thanks to a sturdy deadbolt and Grade 2 positioning; key-free models are also seen as reducing attack surface by removing the keyway, though no one provides lab-grade break-in testing.
-
4.1
based on 12 reviews
Key override reliability: 4.1, based on 12 reviews
Keyed versions provide a dependable physical fallback, while key-free versions lean on 9V emergency power terminals; both approaches work, but key-free owners need to be mindful of battery state to avoid inconvenience.
-
4.1
based on 11 reviews
Door compatibility (deadbolt fit): 4.1, based on 11 reviews
The lock generally fits standard doors and deadbolt cutouts, but many setup flows emphasize careful measuring and some owners report that small door/hardware variances can create mounting challenges.
-
4.1
based on 4 reviews
Auto-relock after failed attempts: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
Keypad security tools like wrong-code limits and temporary lockouts are available and can reduce PIN-guessing risk, though real-world testing depth varies across reviewers.
-
4.1
based on 4 reviews
Finish durability: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
Matte finishes are frequently praised for resisting fingerprints and looking upscale; long-term finish wear is less documented, but at least one review mentions cosmetic scuffs from handling or a tight install.
-
4.0
based on 16 reviews
Auto-lock: 4.0, based on 16 reviews
Auto-lock is flexible (timer-based and, with DoorSense, door-closed-based) and usually reliable, but a few users report edge cases where it attempted to lock when the door was open or wish the door-closed requirement were stricter by default.
-
4.0
based on 6 reviews
Fingerprint: 4.0, based on 6 reviews
Fingerprint unlocking (on Touch models) is often described as extremely fast and accurate, yet at least one long-term owner reports recurring failures that require re-enrollment, suggesting this feature’s reliability can vary by unit and environment.
-
4.0
based on 17 reviews
Bluetooth: 4.0, based on 17 reviews
Bluetooth control is typically quick and responsive, and several reviewers note it can feel faster than hub-based control; it also underpins proximity features like Auto-Unlock on many configurations.
-
4.0
based on 14 reviews
Door-sense: 4.0, based on 14 reviews
DoorSense adds meaningful context (open, closed, ajar) and can prevent the bolt from extending when the door is open, but it may require drilling for a clean install and some users report calibration hassles or occasional misbehavior.
-
4.0
based on 9 reviews
Hub requirement: 4.0, based on 9 reviews
The modular design reduces hard hub dependence, but you still need the right path for your ecosystem: Wi-Fi for broad third-party integrations, or an Apple home hub for Bluetooth-only HomeKit remote access; reviewers also appreciate that Wi-Fi no longer requires a separate bridge.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Keyway quality: 4.0, based on 1 review
Keyway details are limited in the reviews, but keyed models can be rekeyed and accept standard backup keys; key-free variants remove the key cylinder entirely as a potential failure or attack point.
-
4.0
based on 1 review
Pick/drill resistance (if rated): 4.0, based on 1 review
Formal pick/drill ratings are rarely discussed; the most concrete claims focus on key-free designs being harder to pick because there is no key cylinder, while keyed models rely on conventional mechanical security.
-
4.0
based on 18 reviews
Remote access: 4.0, based on 18 reviews
Remote access depends on configuration: Wi-Fi models/modules enable control from anywhere, while Bluetooth-only owners often rely on a HomeKit hub for remote operation; otherwise control is limited to short-range Bluetooth.
-
3.9
based on 11 reviews
Voice control: 3.9, based on 11 reviews
Voice control works well for locking and status checks through Siri/HomeKit and through Alexa/Google when the lock is internet-connected, but unlocking is typically gated behind extra authentication steps and the experience can be less seamless than top competitors.
-
3.8
based on 16 reviews
Installation and Setup: 3.8, based on 16 reviews
Installation is frequently described as DIY-friendly with templates and app walkthroughs, yet several reviewers still ran into alignment/fit issues, module seating mistakes, or DoorSense drilling that turned setup into a longer project.
-
3.8
based on 10 reviews
Notifications: 3.8, based on 10 reviews
Notifications and smart alerts cover events like manual lock/unlock, specific-user activity, auto-lock, and door-ajar warnings, but some reviewers report missed or delayed alerts and others get noisy Wi-Fi reconnect notifications.
-
3.8
based on 12 reviews
Touchscreen: 3.8, based on 12 reviews
Touchscreen designs look sleek and respond well once awake, but glare and sunlight readability remain recurring complaints, and some users want it to wake more reliably with a single touch anywhere on the pad.
-
3.8
based on 18 reviews
Value and Price: 3.8, based on 18 reviews
Value depends heavily on configuration: the base lock can feel reasonably priced for the design and access features, but Wi-Fi and future modules add cost, making it less appealing if long battery life or flawless connectivity are your top priorities.
-
3.8
based on 13 reviews
Auto-unlock: 3.8, based on 13 reviews
Auto-unlock is convenient when it works, using Bluetooth proximity plus location-aware modes, but experiences vary: some report near-perfect reliability while others see misses (especially with Wi-Fi setups) or dislike always-on location permissions.
-
3.8
based on 17 reviews
App: 3.8, based on 17 reviews
The Yale Access app is generally easy to navigate for locking/unlocking, viewing activity, and managing guests, but many reviewers call it dated or slow to load, with some settings only available after a Bluetooth connection and occasional connection hiccups.
-
3.7
based on 2 reviews
Existing hardware reuse: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
Assure Lock 2 usually replaces the full deadbolt rather than reusing existing hardware, but Yale’s Smart Modules can be moved between compatible locks, which reviewers see as a long-term flexibility win.
-
3.7
based on 17 reviews
Wi-Fi: 3.7, based on 17 reviews
Wi-Fi (via the Smart Module or bundled models) unlocks true remote control and broader ecosystem support, but it can add setup complexity, occasional disconnect messages, and noticeably worse battery life compared with Bluetooth-only operation.
-
3.7
based on 12 reviews
Keypad: 3.7, based on 12 reviews
The keypad is easy to use in low light thanks to backlighting, but multiple reviews complain it can be hard to read in direct sunlight and that needing to tap the Yale logo first is not always obvious or convenient.
-
3.6
based on 4 reviews
Backset compatibility: 3.6, based on 4 reviews
Standard backsets appear fine, but at least one review warns that longer-than-average backsets may not be supported, so nonstandard doors should be double-checked before purchase.