Garmin vivomove Trend

Garmin vivomove Trend Review

Brand: Garmin
Released: February 1, 2023
Updated: 3 months ago
3.9
Overall review score
168
Review evidence points
48
Scored features
13
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Garmin Vivomove Trend if you want a stylish analog-looking Garmin with a bright hidden display, useful wellness data, and Qi charging. Skip it if you need built-in GPS, strong sports controls, long Garmin-style battery life, or consistently responsive touch.

Best for

Best for users who want Garmin wellness tracking, notifications, and casual workout stats in an analog-looking watch that feels more like daily jewelry than a sports device.

Not for

Not for runners or athletes who need built-in GPS, physical buttons, detailed workout guidance, onboard apps/music, or multi-week Garmin battery life.

Verdict

The Garmin Vivomove Trend lands best as a polished hybrid watch rather than a serious training tool. Reviewers consistently liked the analog styling, bright hidden display, comfortable wear in many cases, Garmin Connect data, Body Battery-style wellness insights, and the convenience of Qi charging. The tradeoff is that its hidden touchscreen-first interface can be finicky, the connected-GPS experience depends heavily on the phone and sometimes syncs slowly, and battery life is modest by Garmin standards. Heart-rate, sleep, stress, and everyday tracking were often praised, but blood oxygen readings and step counting were less consistently trusted. It feels strongest for casual fitness and daily wellness, with enough smartwatch features to be useful without looking like a full smartwatch.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

48 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    11 (23%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    22 (46%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (23%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (8%)

Pros

  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    style and design: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Style and design were the strongest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the analog look, classy finish, and non-smartwatch appearance.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    display quality: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Display quality was a major improvement for many reviewers, with sharp, clear, legible LCD text, though reflectivity hurt one reviewer's experience.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    comfort: 4.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Comfort was generally strong across reviews, especially for sleep and daily wear, but at least one reviewer disliked the stiff strap overnight.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    heart rate accuracy: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Heart-rate tracking was usually praised as reliable for casual use, with reviewers noting close agreement with straps or other watches, though some saw lag or older-sensor limitations.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    brightness: 4.5, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Brightness was mostly praised as a large improvement, but automatic brightness could lag in bright conditions.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    companion app quality: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Garmin Connect and companion-app data were broadly praised for depth, setup, and post-workout information.

Cons

  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    blood oxygen tracking: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Blood oxygen tracking drew low confidence, with reviewers reporting suspect readings, incomplete overnight capture, and inaccurate low values.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    button controls: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Button controls were a recurring weakness because reviewers missed even a single physical button and found touch-only exercise control harder.
  • 2.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    pairing reliability: 2.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Pairing reliability was mixed to weak, with several reviewers noting the need to keep the app open or wait minutes for phone GPS connection.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Bluetooth connectivity: 2.0, 1 review
    Bluetooth connectivity was criticized in the context of phone sync for connected GPS taking too long.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    coaching features: 2.5, 1 review
    Coaching features were weakly represented because the reviewer specifically regretted the lack of Garmin's Morning Report-style guidance.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    durability: 2.5, 1 review
    Durability raised concern because one reviewer noted the lack of official Gorilla Glass-style protection.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in activity auto-detection, third-party app support, stress tracking, near average in brightness, GPS accuracy, below average in button controls, pairing reliability, Bluetooth connectivity.

Comparison summary

48 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    16 (33%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    14 (29%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    18 (38%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
button controls 2.0 3.9 -1.9
pairing reliability 2.3 4.0 -1.7
Bluetooth connectivity 2.0 3.7 -1.7
durability 2.5 4.2 -1.7
coaching features 2.5 4.0 -1.5
blood oxygen tracking 2.0 3.4 -1.4
activity auto-detection 5.0 3.7 +1.3
charging speed 2.9 4.1 -1.2

Consider This Instead

If you want better pairing reliability

Choose Garmin Vivomove Sport. It scores 5.0 vs 2.3 for pairing reliability, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

If you want better value for money

Choose Amazfit Bip 6. It scores 4.7 vs 3.4 for value for money, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

If you want better button controls

Choose Garmin Forerunner 165. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for button controls, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better blood oxygen tracking

Choose OnePlus Watch 3. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for blood oxygen tracking, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Similar: exercise tracking results The Trend's exercise tracking produced results similar to the Apple Watch Ultra in the reviewer's use.
  • Worse: heart rate accuracy during one run In one run, the Trend's heart-rate tracking was described as fine while the Apple Watch Ultra failed badly.
  • Compared: price tier The Trend's price puts it near full smartwatch options such as the Apple Watch SE.
  • Better: GPS and health-update accuracy For perfect GPS and more accurate health updates, the reviewer says Garmin Fenix is a better fit.

FAQ

Is the Garmin Vivomove Trend good for running?

It is best for casual running and everyday workouts. Reviews found run data often usable, but the connected GPS, limited on-watch data, and touch-only controls make it weaker than a dedicated Forerunner-style sports watch.

How long does the battery last?

Reviewers generally saw about three to five days depending on workouts, notifications, GPS use, and Pulse Ox. Several said Garmin's five-day estimate was accurate, while others called that short for a Garmin fitness watch.

Does wireless charging work well?

Qi charging was one of the most praised additions because it is convenient and reduces dependence on Garmin-only cables. The tradeoff is that some pads are finicky or incompatible, and several reviewers said charging is not especially fast.

Is the display easy to see outdoors?

Most reviewers thought the hidden LCD was much brighter and clearer than earlier Vivomove models. A few still found it reflective or harder to read in bright sunlight, especially before brightness adjusted.

Are the health metrics accurate?

Heart rate, stress, and sleep timing were usually reviewed positively for casual wellness tracking. Blood oxygen readings, sleep-stage precision, and step counts were more mixed.

Does it work better with Android or iPhone?

Notifications can be read on both platforms, and reviewers found iPhone use reliable. Message replies are limited to Android, so iPhone users lose that part of the smartwatch experience.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: pairing reliability, brightness

Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity

#2 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: step counting accuracy, app ecosystem

Cons: Bluetooth connectivity, pairing reliability

#3 Garmin Lily 2 Active
4.3

Good if you want a compact, stylish Garmin with strong GPS, comfort, and week-plus battery life. Skip it if you need richer smartwatch apps, onboard music, bright always-on display, or...

Pros: health tracking accuracy, blood oxygen tracking

Cons: ECG functionality, onboard music storage

#4 Tag Heuer Connected Calibre E4
4.3

Best for luxury-watch styling, vivid TAG faces, solid build, and casual smartwatch use. Skip it if you need top fitness accuracy, call handling, LTE, or strong value.

Pros: contactless payments, pairing reliability

Cons: LTE connectivity, call handling