Glorious Model I 2 Wireless

Glorious Model I 2 Wireless Gaming Mouse Review

Brand: Glorious
Released: August 15, 2023
Updated: 2 months ago
4.1
Overall review score
205
Review evidence points
53
Scored features
13
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Glorious Model I 2 Wireless if you want a lightweight ergonomic mouse with strong tracking, glide, and remappable buttons. Skip it if you need long RGB-on battery life, left-handed support, or a true MMO button grid.

Best for

Best for right-handed gamers who want an ergonomic lightweight wireless mouse with more controls than a basic FPS mouse, strong glide, and flexible button remapping.

Not for

Not for left-handed users, gamers who need excellent RGB-on battery life, or players who want a dedicated MMO button grid or the most feature-packed premium wheel setup.

Verdict

Across the reviews, the Glorious Model I 2 Wireless comes across as a lightweight ergonomic gaming mouse that balances comfort, smooth glide, accurate tracking, and unusually flexible button controls. Reviewers repeatedly liked the hand feel, low weight, responsive sensor, and easy remapping, with several calling it strong for long sessions and travel. The tradeoff is that its feature set sits between categories: it has more buttons than many lightweight FPS mice, but not enough or not ideally placed for dedicated MMO users, and its RGB can drain the battery quickly. Software is generally usable, but battery reporting, sleep behavior, and occasional recognition bugs kept it from feeling fully polished.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

53 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    19 (36%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (45%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (17%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    glide smoothness: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Glide smoothness was a consistent strength, with reviewers describing effortless, smooth movement across pads and surfaces.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews strong consensus
    weight: 4.5, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers strongly praised the low weight, often comparing it favorably with heavier ergonomic competitors.
  • 4.5
    9 reviews strong consensus
    shape comfort: 4.5, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Shape comfort was a repeated strength, with reviewers calling the mouse natural, comfortable, and improved over related models.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Value was generally positive, with reviewers often calling the $100 price fair or strong for the weight and features.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was mostly praised as solid, sturdy, and improved, with one review noting slight creaking.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    sensor performance: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Sensor sentiment was strongly positive, with reviewers calling the BAMF sensor high-performing, spot-on, and free of tracking-speed problems.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    long-session comfort: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Long-session comfort was a major strength, with reviewers reporting no cramping, discomfort, or fatigue over extended use.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Accuracy and tracking precision: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently described tracking as accurate and issue-free during gaming, including precise aiming and smooth tracking.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    ergonomic design: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Ergonomics were one of the strongest themes, especially the contoured shape, thumb rest, and long-use comfort.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    programmable buttons: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Programmable buttons were a major strength, with reviewers valuing remapping, layers, shortcuts, and expanded control options.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    wireless performance: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Wireless performance was strongly positive, with reviewers reporting no latency, response, or gameplay-performance problems.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    switch feel: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch feel was generally positive, with reviewers calling clicks tactile, crisp, satisfying, and nice-feeling.

Cons

  • 2.7
    10 reviews low consensus
    battery life: 2.7, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Battery life was the most divisive weakness: RGB-off results could be fine, but RGB-on drain was repeatedly criticized.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    handedness options: 2.0, 1 review
    Handedness was a limitation because the right-handed design leaves left-handed users out.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    click noise: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Click noise was a downside for reviewers who found the clicks loud.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    software stability: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Software stability was mixed, with some recognition, battery-refresh, and sleep-behavior bugs reported.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    charging convenience: 2.8, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Charging convenience was mixed, with praise for usable charging speed and cable flexibility but complaints about the fiddly USB-C cable.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    tilt gesture controls: 2.5, 1 review
    Tilt controls were a limitation because reviewers missed left-right tilt or more advanced wheel behavior.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Gaming Mice, this product is above average in skate durability, Bluetooth support, cross-platform compatibility, near average in button customization, programmable buttons, below average in battery life, charging convenience, polling rate.

Comparison summary

52 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    15 (29%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    26 (50%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    11 (21%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
battery life 2.7 4.2 -1.5
skate durability 5.0 3.7 +1.3
charging convenience 2.8 4.0 -1.2
Bluetooth support 4.8 3.5 +1.2
polling rate 2.8 3.9 -1.2
cross-platform compatibility 5.0 3.9 +1.1
click noise 2.5 3.5 -1.0
durability over time 3.0 4.0 -1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better battery life

Choose Turtle Beach Kone II. It scores 5.0 vs 2.7 for battery life, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better side button quality

Choose Razer Viper V3 Pro. It scores 4.6 vs 3.0 for side button quality, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better software stability

Choose Razer Basilisk Mobile. It scores 4.5 vs 2.7 for software stability, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better handedness options

Choose Corsair M75 Wireless. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for handedness options, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • More expensive: price The Model I 2 Wireless was positioned as cheaper than the Logitech G502 X Plus.
  • Worse: weight The Model I 2 Wireless was described as dramatically lighter than the Logitech G502 X Plus.
  • Better: button-swapping implementation The reviewer preferred Logitech's simpler, tool-free button-swapping approach.
  • Worse: ergonomics and extra buttons The reviewer preferred the Model I 2 over the ambidextrous Model O for ergonomics and side buttons.

FAQ

Is the Glorious Model I 2 Wireless comfortable for long sessions?

Yes. Multiple reviewers praised the ergonomic shape, thumb rest, low weight, and long-session comfort, with several reporting no wrist, arm, or hand fatigue.

How is the battery life?

Battery life depends heavily on RGB. Reviewers often found it acceptable with lighting off, but several criticized fast drain when RGB was enabled.

Is it good for FPS games?

Mostly yes. Reviewers praised its tracking, glide, low weight, and responsiveness in games like Warzone, Valorant, and Battlefield, though one reviewer personally struggled with the thumb rest.

Is it a true MMO mouse?

Not exactly. Reviewers liked the programmable buttons and layer-shift functions, but several said the layout and button count fall short of a dedicated MMO mouse.

How good is the wireless performance?

Reviewer sentiment was strong. They reported no noticeable 2.4 GHz latency, stable connections, and responsive wireless gameplay, while Bluetooth was treated as useful but less ideal for gaming.

Is the software easy to use?

Generally yes. Reviewers liked the simple remapping and profiles, but they also noted battery reporting, sleep behavior, and occasional recognition issues.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: acceleration control, wireless latency

Cons: onboard memory, MMO gaming suitability

#2 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: click latency, macro support

Cons: firmware reliability, tilt gesture controls

#3 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: balance and weight distribution, build quality

Cons: dock compatibility, Bluetooth support

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: Accuracy and tracking precision, click latency

Cons: software stability, profile switching