- Better: long-term replacement The reviewer liked the Nova Brilliant but probably would not replace an Apple Watch with it.
- Alternative: daily wearable preference The reviewer did not feel the need to return to the Apple Watch after using the Nova.
- More expensive: price and appearance The reviewer says the Nova is cheaper than a comparable stainless steel Apple Watch and better looking.
Withings ScanWatch Nova Review
Bottom Line
Choose the ScanWatch Nova if you want a luxury-looking hybrid with excellent battery life and deep health tracking. Skip it if you need a full smartwatch, built-in GPS, rich notifications, or low price.
Best for
Best for people who want a stylish analog-looking watch with discreet health tracking, ECG, SpO2, temperature trends, steps, sleep data, and weeks-long battery life. It especially suits buyers who value classic watch design more than app-heavy smartwatch features.
Not for
Not for serious athletes or smartwatch-first users who need built-in GPS, detailed workout analytics, third-party apps, payments, replies, music controls, or a large interactive screen. Price-sensitive buyers may also find better feature depth elsewhere.
Verdict
Reviewers consistently frame the Withings ScanWatch Nova as a luxury analog-style watch first and a smartwatch second. Its strongest appeal is the combination of premium design, weeks-long battery life, and broad health tracking through ECG, SpO2, heart rate, temperature, sleep, and steps. The tradeoff is clear: its small OLED display, limited interaction, lack of built-in GPS, thin third-party app support, and high price make it less compelling for users who expect an Apple Watch-like experience. Fitness feedback is useful but uneven, with auto-detection and connected GPS drawing repeated caveats. The Nova works best as a discreet health companion for people who value classic watch styling more than full smartwatch depth.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- More expensive: price The Brilliant model is described as cheaper than Apple Watch Ultra 2.
- Worse: case size The Brilliant version is described as smaller next to the Apple Watch Ultra 2.
- Worse: formal style The Nova is preferred over the Apple Watch Ultra 2 for wearing with formal clothing.
- Cheaper: price The Brilliant model is priced higher than the Apple Watch Series 10.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
47 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 36% 17 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 38% 18 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 15% 7 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 11% 5 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Battery life was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly reporting weeks of use and little battery anxiety.
-
Style and design were the most consistent strengths, with reviewers praising its analog look, elegance, premium feel, and compliment-worthy appearance.
-
Withings' broader app and device ecosystem was praised for combining watch data with scales and other health products in a useful dashboard.
-
Materials quality was praised through references to robust glass, rotating bezel construction, and premium materials.
-
Software smoothness was supported by seamless watch-app syncing in two reviews.
-
Calorie estimates earned praise in one review as more accurately rendered than the reviewer's previous Fitbit experience.
-
Durability evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer saying the watch still looked pristine after travel and rough handling.
-
Heart rate accuracy received strong support from one reviewer who compared it favorably with a chest strap.
-
Wellness insights were praised when they made health data actionable, contextual, or useful for spotting broader health risks.
-
Menu navigation was praised as easy and intuitive through the rotating crown.
-
Pairing and syncing were praised as simple and seamless in the supporting reviews.
-
Build quality came across as premium, with reviewers praising the solid construction, price-appropriate finish, and premium materials.
-
Step counting accuracy was praised as user-friendly and accurate, including one comparison favoring it over a previous Fitbit.
-
Comfort was a major strength across reviews, especially for all-day and overnight wear, with lighter models and comfortable bands helping.
-
The companion app was repeatedly praised as clear, efficient, user-friendly, powerful, and good at presenting health and activity data.
-
Health tracking accuracy was one of the most praised areas, with reviewers describing accurate sensors, useful health data, and results comparable to other devices.
-
Safety features were supported by health-risk warning potential, especially around continuous tracking while awake or asleep.
-
Charging speed was viewed positively, with reviewers describing full recharges from under an hour to a respectable two hours.
-
Bands were often praised for comfort, flexibility, quality, and included tools, though some reviewers found adjustment imperfect or only liked the metal band best.
-
Cross-platform support was supported by one positive app review noting iOS/Android availability and integration with major health platforms.
-
Customization evidence was limited but positive, with one reviewer valuing the ability to reorder workout options and screens in the app.
-
Blood oxygen tracking was generally useful and easy once working, though one reviewer needed several attempts to get an SpO2 reading.
-
Brightness handling was praised for automatic adjustment, although the evidence is limited to the small OLED display.
-
ECG functionality was usually praised as easy, useful, or medically meaningful, though one reviewer noted setup delays and another found it movement-sensitive.
-
Coaching-style insights were considered useful when they translated health data into behaviors or an actionable overview.
-
Water resistance was viewed as capable but not class-leading, with one reviewer comparing it unfavorably to Apple Watch Ultra 2 and another noting a significant 10ATM bump.
-
Size evidence was limited to the Brilliant version being suitable for smaller wrists.
-
Display quality was generally legible and improved, but its small size and smartwatch limitations caused mixed reactions.
-
Temperature tracking was viewed as medically useful by several reviewers, though one reviewer questioned its wrist accuracy and another found it irrelevant day to day.
-
Call handling is basic but useful as a screening alert, rather than a full phone-call experience from the watch.
-
Fitness tracking accuracy was mixed, ranging from good workout measurements to specific inaccuracies in automatically logged activities.
-
Outdoor visibility was mixed: some reviewers found the OLED readable in sunlight, while others struggled with direct sun or reflections.
-
The user interface was split between intuitive simplicity and the limitations of a passive, small-display interface.
-
Reviewers liked that activity detection can work reliably and conveniently, but several also found false or incomplete auto-detected sessions.
-
Fit was mixed: some reviewers achieved a good or problem-free fit, while one struggled with the metal strap being too tight or too loose.
Cons
-
Value was mixed: reviewers often called it expensive, but some felt the design, build, battery life, and health tools could justify the price.
-
Watch face quality was mixed, with easier time reading and a premium analog face offset by weak lume in some reviews.
-
Sleep tracking accuracy was mixed, with one review finding it pretty accurate and others doubting accuracy or reporting missed sleep periods.
-
Notifications were a major tradeoff: some reviewers had no issues or found them readable, but several disliked the limited, non-interactive alert experience.
-
Charging convenience split reviewers: the newer cradle was praised by one reviewer, but several others called the charger cheap, inelegant, or lacking wireless convenience.
-
Control feedback was mixed: the crown interface could feel intuitive, but the crown or bezel placement could also be awkward to manipulate.
-
Workout variety was mixed: one reviewer found options limited, another called workout tracking less comprehensive, while another appreciated broad automatic activity support.
-
Smartwatch features were consistently limited, with reviewers framing the Nova as a health-focused hybrid rather than a full smartwatch.
-
Connected workout tracking could drop the watch connection and leave gaps, creating a Bluetooth-related caveat during GPS-linked activities.
-
GPS-linked tracking drew repeated complaints about connection gaps and missing map routes, reinforcing the lack of robust built-in GPS.
-
Mapping evidence was negative in one review, where the app produced a black-screen map for a recorded route.
-
Third-party app support was a weakness, with reviewers telling app-focused buyers to look elsewhere or comparing it unfavorably with full smartwatches.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in ECG functionality, calorie tracking usefulness, below average in GPS accuracy, workout tracking variety, Bluetooth connectivity.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 25% 2 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 75% 6 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPS accuracy | 2.0 | 4.1 | -2.1 |
| ECG functionality | 4.1 | 2.6 | +1.5 |
| workout tracking variety | 2.7 | 4.3 | -1.6 |
| calorie tracking usefulness | 4.8 | 3.2 | +1.6 |
| Bluetooth connectivity | 2.2 | 3.8 | -1.6 |
| third-party app support | 1.8 | 3.2 | -1.4 |
| mapping and navigation | 2.0 | 3.4 | -1.4 |
| smartwatch features | 2.3 | 3.5 | -1.2 |
FAQ
Is the Withings ScanWatch Nova a full smartwatch?
No. Reviewers repeatedly describe it as a health-focused hybrid with basic notifications, alarms, timers, and small-screen alerts rather than a full smartwatch with apps, replies, payments, or rich interaction.
How good is the battery life?
Battery life is one of the strongest points. Reviewers reported weeks of use, low battery anxiety, and enough endurance for continuous health and sleep tracking, though heavy workouts can reduce runtime.
Is it good for serious fitness tracking?
It is better as a health tracker than a serious training watch. Reviews praised general accuracy but criticized the lack of built-in GPS, limited workout depth, and occasional auto-detection or mapping issues.
How accurate are the health sensors?
Reviewers generally found health tracking accurate, especially heart rate and ECG-related features. Blood oxygen and temperature tracking were considered useful, though SpO2 sometimes required retries and temperature usefulness was more mixed.
Is the ScanWatch Nova comfortable enough for all-day wear?
Most reviewers found it comfortable for daily and overnight wear, helped by lighter models and soft bands. Fit can still depend on the strap, and one reviewer struggled to size the metal bracelet properly.
Is the high price justified?
Reviewers were split. Many called it expensive, but several felt the premium watch design, long battery life, build quality, and health tracking could justify the cost for the right buyer.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
digitaltrends.com
- Review score
- 4.2/5
the-gadgeteer.com
- Review score
- 4.4/5
pocketables.com
- Review score
- 4.1/5
zdnet.com
- Review score
- 4.4/5
Consider This Instead
If you want better third-party app support
Choose Garmin Forerunner 265. It scores 5.0 vs 1.8 for third-party app support, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better GPS accuracy
Choose Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for GPS accuracy, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better smartwatch features
Choose Apple Watch Ultra 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.3 for smartwatch features, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better mapping and navigation
Choose Samsung Galaxy Watch 6. It scores 4.9 vs 2.0 for mapping and navigation, with a 4.1 overall score.
Overall Top Smartwatches Alternatives
Best for rugged outdoor training, long battery life, accurate GPS, maps, calls, and a genuinely useful flashlight. Skip it if the high price, tactical extras, proprietary charging cable, or mixed...
Pros: wellness insights, build quality
Cons: LTE connectivity, band quality
Good if you want the best balanced Apple Watch for an older upgrade, stronger battery, comfort, and health tools. Skip it if you own Series 10, need week-long battery, or...
Pros: ECG functionality, app ecosystem
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, recovery insights
Choose it if you want a rugged Garmin hybrid with real hands, a sharp AMOLED display, strong tracking, and a genuinely useful flashlight. Skip it if price, full maps, onboard...
Pros: heart rate accuracy, GPS accuracy
Cons: onboard music storage, mapping and navigation
Best for bright AMOLED visuals, strong battery life, accurate GPS, maps, and standout value. Skip it if you need rich apps, reliable payments, LTE, ECG, or the cleanest companion app.
Pros: step counting accuracy, menu navigation
Cons: voice assistant quality, contactless payments