Review: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active

Updated: 15 hours ago
3.6
Based on methodology below
130
Insights analyzed
52
Grouped by key features
6
From expert reviews
Scores below reflect consolidated expert coverage across these features.
Bottom Line

Choose it for cheap calls, solid battery life, and basic fitness tracking. Skip it if you need built-in GPS, NFC payments, deeper apps, or an AMOLED screen.

Best for

Budget-minded buyers who want a large screen, Bluetooth calling, long battery life, and basic health tracking for everyday use. It fits casual smartwatch use much better than serious training.

Not for

Anyone who needs built-in GPS, NFC payments, richer third-party apps, stronger voice assistant behavior, or a more premium AMOLED display. Reviewers also flagged the plastic-heavy build and strap design as compromises.

Verdict

The Redmi Watch 5 Active earns its keep by doing the basics well for very little money. Across the reviews, its best traits are battery life, Bluetooth calling, a big readable screen, and a health suite that feels better than expected at this price. The tradeoff is clear: this is a compromise-heavy budget watch with a plastic build, no built-in GPS, no NFC payments, limited assistant behavior, and an LCD panel that falls short of better AMOLED alternatives. If your goal is low-cost everyday notifications, calls, and casual fitness tracking, it makes sense. If you want richer apps, premium materials, or stronger outdoor workout tools, the limitations show quickly.

Pros

  • 4.5
    based on 5 reviews
    workout tracking variety: 4.5, based on 5 reviews
    Workout variety is a real strength, with reviewers repeatedly mentioning large sport-mode counts and broad activity coverage.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    water resistance: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Water resistance is strong on paper at 5 ATM or equivalent pressure ratings, even if workout support for water activities is inconsistent.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    cross-platform compatibility: 4.5, based on 1 review
    The watch was explicitly reported to work with both Android phones and iPhones.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    reliability: 4.5, based on 1 review
    One reviewer explicitly reported stable connection behavior with no obvious syncing problems in day-to-day use.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    touchscreen responsiveness: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Touch responsiveness was directly praised in the written review.
  • 4.3
    based on 4 reviews
    battery life: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
    Battery life is a clear strength, with most reviewers reporting about a week to roughly two weeks depending on usage, even if claims looked optimistic.
  • 4.3
    based on 4 reviews
    software smoothness: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
    Software smoothness is a plus, with repeated mentions of smooth transitions, animations, and low lag.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    companion app quality: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Mi Fitness gets positive feedback for being user-friendly, data-rich, and modern-looking despite the budget positioning.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    heart rate accuracy: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Heart rate tracking is one of the stronger sensor areas, with reviewers calling it better than expected and broadly in line with reference devices.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    menu navigation: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Menus and on-watch navigation are easy enough to use, with reviewers calling the structure simple and straightforward.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    outdoor visibility: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Outdoor visibility is good enough at high brightness, with reviewers saying the display stayed readable outside.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    pairing reliability: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Pairing and day-to-day connection behavior were mostly positive once Mi Fitness was set up.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    user interface: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    The interface is easy to understand and offers useful widget organization, even if it remains fairly basic.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    smartwatch features: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    For a budget model, the watch offers a surprisingly broad feature set including calls, Alexa support, and extras like remote camera control.
  • 4.1
    based on 4 reviews
    value for money: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
    Value is one of the watch's strongest arguments thanks to the very low price, though at least one comparison reviewer felt spending a little more buys a noticeably better upgrade.
  • 4.0
    based on 4 reviews
    blood oxygen tracking: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
    Blood oxygen tracking is widely available and repeatedly mentioned as a core health feature, with some reviewers finding readings close to comparison devices.
  • 4.0
    based on 4 reviews
    button controls: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
    The single side button is consistently described as useful and straightforward for power, home, or app-list access.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    comfort: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    Comfort is generally good because the watch is light, but strap design can make wearing it less convenient than it should be.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    activity auto-detection: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Auto-detection is limited to simple activities, but reviewers did note the watch can recognize basic exercise like walking without a manual start.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    charging convenience: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Charging is simple thanks to the magnetic charger design, though it still uses a proprietary cable instead of wireless charging.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    charging speed: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Charging speed is described as decent rather than class-leading, with one reviewer citing a full charge in about 80 minutes.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    customization options: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Customization is respectable for a budget watch, with configurable tiles, widgets, and some watch-face tweaking.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    health tracking accuracy: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Health tracking as a whole is better than expected for the price, with reviewers calling the sensor package solid for general monitoring.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    sleep tracking accuracy: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Sleep tracking is feature-complete for the class, with REM and nap detection mentioned, and at least one reviewer called the accuracy pretty good.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    stress tracking: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Stress tracking is included as part of the standard health suite and is presented as a built-in wellness feature.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    wellness insights: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Wellness features go beyond raw stats with sleep charts, recommendations, body-battery-style readouts, and similar overview tools.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    Bluetooth connectivity: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Bluetooth connectivity supports calls and watch-to-phone features, and one reviewer specifically reported stable connection behavior.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    fitness tracking accuracy: 4.0, based on 1 review
    One written review directly credited the accelerometer and workout setup with helping the user track activity accurately.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    music controls: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Music controls are available for phone playback from the watch.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    step counting accuracy: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Step counting got a positive single-review mention, with no obvious pedometer issues reported.
  • 3.8
    based on 3 reviews
    watch face quality: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
    Watch-face selection is a plus overall, though storage and customization limits keep it from feeling unlimited.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    app ecosystem: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    The watch leans on Mi Fitness and can link with common fitness services, giving it a modest but usable app ecosystem rather than a broad one.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    coaching features: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Coaching-style features are light but present through items like Vitality Score and VO2 Max-related readouts rather than deep guided training.
  • 3.8
    based on 2 reviews
    recovery insights: 3.8, based on 2 reviews
    Recovery-style metrics exist in a limited form through features like Vitality Score, giving some post-activity insight without advanced coaching depth.
  • 3.7
    based on 6 reviews
    call handling: 3.7, based on 6 reviews
    Bluetooth calling is one of the standout smartwatch features, though speaker quality and assistant-related call workflows still come with compromises.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    build quality: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Build quality is acceptable for the price, though the case is clearly plastic and premium feel is limited.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    fit: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Fit is generally comfortable, though the large case can look or feel tall on smaller wrists.
  • 3.6
    based on 5 reviews
    display quality: 3.6, based on 5 reviews
    Display impressions are mixed: the big screen is easy to read and sometimes crisp, but the LCD panel lacks the contrast and premium look of AMOLED rivals.
  • 3.5
    based on 2 reviews
    style and design: 3.5, based on 2 reviews
    Styling is decent for the price, but several reviewers still thought the plastic-heavy design looked obviously budget-oriented.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    calorie tracking usefulness: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Calorie tracking is present as part of the watch's daily activity stats, but reviewers treated it as a basic metric rather than a standout feature.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    operating system experience: 3.5, based on 1 review
    The software experience is basic but usable, with a lightweight feel rather than a premium one.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 4 reviews
    band quality: 3.4, based on 4 reviews
    Band feedback is mixed: the strap material is decent and soft enough, but several reviewers disliked the awkward fastening design.
  • 3.3
    based on 5 reviews
    smartphone notifications: 3.3, based on 5 reviews
    Notifications are dependable and customizable, but reply support is limited or absent depending on the reviewer and use case.
  • 3.3
    based on 4 reviews
    brightness: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
    Screen brightness is usable, and one written review praised auto-brightness, but multiple video reviewers complained about missing automatic brightness control.
  • 3.2
    based on 3 reviews
    materials quality: 3.2, based on 3 reviews
    Materials are functional rather than premium, centered on plastic construction and TPU strap components.
  • 2.8
    based on 3 reviews
    durability: 2.8, based on 3 reviews
    Durability is mixed because the TPU strap material is durable, but reviewers also raised concerns about plastic lugs and long-term wear.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    third-party app support: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Third-party app support is limited to links with external fitness services rather than true installable app support on the watch.
  • 1.9
    based on 5 reviews
    voice assistant quality: 1.9, based on 5 reviews
    Voice assistant support is inconsistent: some reviews mention Alexa, but availability, reliability, and spoken responses are limited.
  • 1.5
    based on 2 reviews
    GPS accuracy: 1.5, based on 2 reviews
    GPS is a major compromise because the watch lacks built-in GPS and instead depends on the phone for route-based workout data.
  • 1.0
    based on 2 reviews
    contactless payments: 1.0, based on 2 reviews
    There is no NFC payment support, so contactless payments are a clear omission.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    onboard music storage: 1.0, based on 1 review
    The watch does not provide onboard storage for audio files.
  • 1.0
    based on 1 review
    Wi-Fi connectivity: 1.0, based on 1 review
    There is no built-in Wi-Fi support.

FAQ

Does the Redmi Watch 5 Active have built-in GPS?

No. The reviews consistently say the watch lacks built-in GPS and relies on the phone for route-based location data.

Can it make and receive calls?

Yes. Multiple reviewers confirmed Bluetooth calling works through the paired phone, though call quality and speaker loudness are only moderate.

Does it support NFC or contactless payments?

No. The reviews explicitly say there is no NFC payment support.

Is the display AMOLED?

No. Reviewers repeatedly describe it as a large LCD display, which is readable but less premium than AMOLED alternatives.

Is it good for workouts and health tracking?

For basic tracking, yes. Reviewers liked the heart rate, blood oxygen, sleep, stress, and large workout-mode count, but serious outdoor athletes may be frustrated by the missing built-in GPS.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

#1
4.6
Choose if you want premium GPS, long battery life, and tactical or training depth in one rugged watch. Skip if you mainly want...
Pros: reliability, GPS accuracy, display quality, durability, workout tracking variety, coaching features, build quality
Cons: value for money
#2
4.3
Choose it for the brilliant screen, polished Wear OS software, and broad health features. Skip it if you need multi-day battery life or...
Pros: brightness, outdoor visibility, workout tracking variety, display quality, activity auto-detection, durability, charging speed
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, battery life, blood oxygen tracking, ECG functionality
#3
4.3
Choose the Ultra 3 if you want Apple’s biggest screen, strong GPS, and satellite safety in one smartwatch. Skip it if you need...
Pros: display quality, brightness, outdoor visibility, app ecosystem, smartwatch features, water resistance, workout tracking variety
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, size options, value for money, fit, companion app quality, coaching features
#4
4.3
Choose it for top-tier GPS and phone-free LTE safety. Skip it if you do not need those extras or if the big case...
Pros: GPS accuracy, workout tracking variety, pairing reliability, user interface, build quality, fitness tracking accuracy, heart rate accuracy
Cons: size options, fit, value for money, comfort, software smoothness