Siri on the watch was praised for reliable, fast everyday tasks like timers, music, and calendar events.
Pros: reliability, comfort
Cons: calorie tracking usefulness, mapping and navigation
Best 2024 Smartwatches for voice assistant quality
Release year
Voice assistant evidence was limited but positive when using Google Assistant instead of Bixby.
Pros: build quality, software smoothness
Cons: stress tracking, blood oxygen tracking
Voice assistant evidence was positive, especially the ability to use Google Assistant and get fast responses.
Pros: materials quality, workout tracking variety
Cons: size options, cross-platform compatibility
Voice assistant quality was generally useful thanks to Google Assistant, though one reviewer noted recognition could be slow.
Pros: charging speed, Bluetooth connectivity
Cons: ECG functionality, recovery insights
Voice assistant quality was mostly positive for timers, activity starts, and off-grid commands, though it still requires a button and is not always faster.
Pros: workout tracking variety, onboard music storage
Cons: LTE connectivity, value for money
Voice assistant quality improved with on-device Siri and faster responses, but dictation and offline capabilities still had occasional limits.
Pros: app ecosystem, smartwatch features
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, blood oxygen tracking
Voice assistant use was generally acceptable to strong, with Google Assistant praised for direct answers, though one review noted less-crisp responses.
Pros: software smoothness, charging speed
Cons: ECG functionality, safety features
Voice assistant quality was mixed: some reviewers loved the AI controls, while others found it flaky or easily confused.
Pros: resume later function, brightness
Cons: safety features, activity auto-detection
Voice assistant evidence is limited but mixed-positive: switching to Google Assistant is recommended because Bixby performed poorly for the reviewer.
Pros: display quality, durability
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, antioxidant index
Voice assistant quality was mixed: voice-to-text and Google Assistant worked well for some, but many missed Gemini or found the assistant experience dated or robotic.
Pros: outdoor visibility, pairing reliability
Cons: calorie tracking usefulness, materials quality
Voice assistant support was inconsistent across reviews: some sources reported no support, while others found Alexa handy but limited or slow.
Pros: cross-platform compatibility, pairing reliability
Cons: third-party app support, contactless payments
Voice assistant support was inconsistent: some Alexa use was helpful, but missing, regional, slow, or read-only behavior held it back.
Pros: wellness insights, Bluetooth connectivity
Cons: contactless payments, third-party app support
Voice assistant support was weak because it mostly relayed the phone assistant and felt gimmicky, flawed, or unnecessary.
Pros: pairing reliability, materials quality
Cons: data privacy, health tracking accuracy
Voice assistant quality was a clear weakness because Google Assistant is missing and workarounds were described as unsmooth or disappointing.
Pros: menu navigation, battery life
Cons: ECG functionality, voice assistant quality
Voice assistant support is the clearest smart-feature drawback because reviewers repeatedly complain that Google Assistant is missing.
Pros: touchscreen responsiveness, software smoothness
Cons: ECG functionality, LTE connectivity
Voice assistant quality is poor because the reviewer noted effectively no voice assistant support.
Pros: step counting accuracy, display quality
Cons: voice assistant quality, contactless payments
Voice assistant support is missing and cited as part of the watch’s limited smart-device experience.
Pros: brightness, display quality
Cons: call handling, voice assistant quality