Glorious Model D 2 Pro 4k/8k

Glorious Model D 2 Pro 4k/8k Gaming Mouse Review

Brand: Glorious
Released: October 17, 2023
Updated: 2 months ago
3.7
Overall review score
184
Review evidence points
50
Scored features
10
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Glorious Model D 2 Pro if you want a very light right-handed esports mouse with strong tracking and easy software. Skip it if 4K/8K polling, short high-rate battery life, or cheaper-feeling plastics bother you.

Best for

Best for right-handed competitive FPS players who prioritize low weight, strong tracking, smooth skates, and high polling-rate options over flashier design or long 4K battery life.

Not for

Not for left-handed users, gamers who dislike frequent charging, buyers who want a clearly premium-feeling shell, or anyone unlikely to notice 4K/8K polling gains.

Verdict

The Glorious Model D 2 Pro 4K/8K is best understood as a focused esports mouse with excellent tracking, low weight, smooth glide, and easy software. Reviewers repeatedly liked the sensor, PTFE feet, right-handed ergonomic shape, and competitive responsiveness. The tradeoff is that its headline polling rate is not universally meaningful: several reviewers could not feel a real difference versus 1,000Hz or 2,000Hz, while high polling sharply reduced battery life. Premium feel, side-button placement, firmware updating, and dongle/charging convenience also drew recurring criticism, making the mouse stronger as a performance tool than as an all-around premium package.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

50 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    12 (24%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    20 (40%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (22%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    7 (14%)

Pros

  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    glide smoothness: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Glide smoothness was one of the strongest attributes, with nearly every direct review praising the PTFE feet or smooth movement.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    weight: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the very light 60-62g body.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    FPS gaming suitability: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers strongly agreed the mouse is suited to FPS and competitive gaming because it is light, accurate, and responsive.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Accuracy and tracking precision: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently praised tracking and in-game precision, though one noted extreme DPI levels became difficult or unusable.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    button customization: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Customization drew strong praise because Glorious Core made remapping and performance settings easy, with many options available.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    sensor performance: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Sensor performance was strongly praised for smooth, consistent updates and problem-free tracking across games and surfaces.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews strong consensus
    software usability: 4.2, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Software usability was broadly praised as simple, clean, intuitive, and easy to use, despite some feature-depth and platform caveats.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was mostly positive, with several reviewers finding the shell sturdy or well built, despite some premium-feel complaints elsewhere.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    ergonomic design: 4.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Ergonomics were generally praised for right-handed comfort, but one reviewer disliked the front and left-side slope.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    shape comfort: 4.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Shape comfort was mostly positive, especially for ergonomic right-handed use, but some reviewers found the side/front shape imperfect.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    switch feel: 4.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch feel was generally positive for light, spammable, tactile optical clicks, though one reviewer found them less refined than rivals.
  • 4.1
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    scroll wheel quality: 4.1, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Scroll wheel quality was generally positive, though one reviewer found it merely average.

Cons

  • 1.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    handedness options: 1.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Handedness options were negative because reviewers repeatedly called out the right-handed-only design and lack of a left-handed variant.
  • 2.3
    5 reviews strong consensus
    charging convenience: 2.3, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Charging convenience scored poorly because reviewers disliked the recessed or one-way USB-C connection, dongle cable setup, frequent charging, and weak low-battery warnings.
  • 1.5
    1 review
    Bluetooth support: 1.5, 1 review
    Bluetooth absence became a practical complaint in one test because a 2.4GHz issue forced wired use.
  • 2.2
    2 reviews limited evidence
    connection stability: 2.2, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Connection stability was a concern in two reviews, with one reporting dropouts and another describing random direction clicks at 4K.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    firmware reliability: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Firmware reliability was a recurring weak spot, with reviewers needing multiple attempts or reinstalling software after failed updates.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    2.4GHz connectivity: 2.0, 1 review
    One reviewer reported a real 2.4GHz adapter drawback, saying it could strain connected devices, so evidence for the wireless dongle was negative rather than broadly tested.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Gaming Mice, this product is above average in profile switching, debounce customization, switch durability, near average in value for money, ergonomic design, below average in 2.4GHz connectivity, connection stability, Bluetooth support.

Comparison summary

50 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    12 (24%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    15 (30%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    23 (46%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
2.4GHz connectivity 2.0 4.4 -2.4
connection stability 2.2 4.5 -2.4
Bluetooth support 1.5 3.6 -2.1
charging convenience 2.3 4.0 -1.7
RGB features 2.0 3.7 -1.7
battery life 2.9 4.2 -1.3
cross-platform compatibility 2.5 3.9 -1.4
premium feel 2.9 4.0 -1.1

Consider This Instead

If you want better connection stability

Choose Corsair Sabre V2 Pro. It scores 5.0 vs 2.2 for connection stability, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: DPI ceiling PCMag said the Model D 2 Pro has a lower DPI ceiling than the Razer DeathAdder V3 Pro.
  • Better: ergonomic lightweight mouse benchmark The reviewer still treated Razer's DeathAdder V3 Pro as the ergonomic lightweight benchmark.
  • Better: grip texture The reviewer found the Model D 2 Pro shell more slippery than Razer's DeathAdder V3 Pro.
  • Better: value for money Tom's Guide said the Cherry M68 Pro offers better value for money.

Fnatic x Lamzu Maya 8K

  • Better: value for money Tom's Guide said the Fnatic x Lamzu Maya 8K offers better value for money.

FAQ

Is the Glorious Model D 2 Pro good for competitive gaming?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised its light weight, accurate sensor, smooth glide, and high polling options for competitive or FPS use.

Is 4K/8K polling worth it?

Only for very serious competitive players with the right setup. Several reviewers said they could not reliably feel the difference, and high polling reduced battery life.

How is the battery life?

At 1,000Hz, reviewers found the rated 80 hours solid or good. At 4,000Hz, multiple reviewers complained about much shorter runtime, surprise shutdowns, or battery anxiety.

Is it comfortable?

Mostly for right-handed palm or claw users. The shape earned praise, but side-button placement and certain contours bothered several reviewers.

How good is the software?

Glorious Core was usually described as simple, clean, and easy for DPI, polling, profiles, remapping, macros, debounce, and lift-off settings. Firmware updates and macros were less reliable in some reviews.

Does it work for left-handed users?

No reviewer treated it as a good left-handed option. The right-handed shape and side-button placement were repeatedly called out as limiting.

Does it feel premium?

Not consistently. Some reviewers found the build sturdy, but others said the plastic, coating, and plain design felt cheap or less premium than rivals.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: acceleration control, wireless latency

Cons: onboard memory, MMO gaming suitability

#2 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: click latency, macro support

Cons: firmware reliability, tilt gesture controls

#3 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: balance and weight distribution, build quality

Cons: dock compatibility, Bluetooth support

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: Accuracy and tracking precision, click latency

Cons: software stability, profile switching