Siri on the watch was praised for reliable, fast everyday tasks like timers, music, and calendar events.
Pros: reliability, comfort
Cons: calorie tracking usefulness, mapping and navigation
Best 2024 Wearable Tech for voice assistant quality
Narrow by product type
Showing Wearable Tech only. Switch back to all Smartwatches anytime.
Release year
Voice assistant evidence was limited but positive when using Google Assistant instead of Bixby.
Pros: build quality, software smoothness
Cons: stress tracking, blood oxygen tracking
Voice assistant evidence was positive, especially the ability to use Google Assistant and get fast responses.
Pros: materials quality, workout tracking variety
Cons: size options, cross-platform compatibility
Voice assistant quality was generally useful thanks to Google Assistant, though one reviewer noted recognition could be slow.
Pros: charging speed, Bluetooth connectivity
Cons: ECG functionality, recovery insights
Voice assistant quality was mostly positive for timers, activity starts, and off-grid commands, though it still requires a button and is not always faster.
Pros: workout tracking variety, onboard music storage
Cons: LTE connectivity, value for money
Voice assistant quality improved with on-device Siri and faster responses, but dictation and offline capabilities still had occasional limits.
Pros: app ecosystem, smartwatch features
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, blood oxygen tracking
Voice assistant use was generally acceptable to strong, with Google Assistant praised for direct answers, though one review noted less-crisp responses.
Pros: software smoothness, charging speed
Cons: ECG functionality, safety features
Voice assistant quality was mixed: some reviewers loved the AI controls, while others found it flaky or easily confused.
Pros: resume later function, brightness
Cons: safety features, activity auto-detection
Voice assistant evidence is limited but mixed-positive: switching to Google Assistant is recommended because Bixby performed poorly for the reviewer.
Pros: display quality, durability
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, antioxidant index
Voice assistant quality was mixed: voice-to-text and Google Assistant worked well for some, but many missed Gemini or found the assistant experience dated or robotic.
Pros: outdoor visibility, pairing reliability
Cons: calorie tracking usefulness, materials quality
Voice assistant support was inconsistent across reviews: some sources reported no support, while others found Alexa handy but limited or slow.
Pros: cross-platform compatibility, pairing reliability
Cons: third-party app support, contactless payments
Voice assistant support was inconsistent: some Alexa use was helpful, but missing, regional, slow, or read-only behavior held it back.
Pros: wellness insights, Bluetooth connectivity
Cons: contactless payments, third-party app support
Voice assistant support was weak because it mostly relayed the phone assistant and felt gimmicky, flawed, or unnecessary.
Pros: pairing reliability, materials quality
Cons: data privacy, health tracking accuracy
Voice assistant quality was a clear weakness because Google Assistant is missing and workarounds were described as unsmooth or disappointing.
Pros: menu navigation, battery life
Cons: ECG functionality, voice assistant quality
Voice assistant support is the clearest smart-feature drawback because reviewers repeatedly complain that Google Assistant is missing.
Pros: touchscreen responsiveness, software smoothness
Cons: ECG functionality, LTE connectivity
Voice assistant quality is poor because the reviewer noted effectively no voice assistant support.
Pros: step counting accuracy, display quality
Cons: voice assistant quality, contactless payments
Voice assistant support is missing and cited as part of the watch’s limited smart-device experience.
Pros: brightness, display quality
Cons: call handling, voice assistant quality