Showing Garmin only. Switch back to all brands anytime.
The operating system experience is positive overall, with reviewers describing it as convenient, well rounded, and a seamless blend of fitness and daily smartwatch use.
Pros: health tracking accuracy, software smoothness
Cons: LTE connectivity, mapping and navigation
The operating system experience is strong overall, described as more robust and as operating well for endurance use.
Pros: GPS accuracy, charging speed
Cons: ECG functionality, voice assistant quality
The OS experience was viewed as effective and more fun with the refreshed AMOLED-era interface.
Pros: water resistance, workout tracking variety
Cons: LTE connectivity, ECG functionality
Operating system experience was polarized, with one review calling it one of the best user experiences and another finding Garmin interfaces frustrating after Apple.
Pros: GPS accuracy, app ecosystem
Cons: ECG functionality, calorie tracking usefulness
Operating system experience is mixed: one reviewer found it intuitive, while others preferred competing smartwatch platforms or criticized the OS.
Pros: recovery insights, GPS accuracy
Cons: software smoothness, fitness tracking accuracy
The operating system experience was mixed, with reviewers saying Garmin still needed polish in its AMOLED/touch software flow.
Pros: fitness tracking accuracy, wellness insights
Cons: software smoothness, ECG functionality
The operating-system experience was functional but not very modern, and one reviewer criticized Garmin's software segmentation.
Pros: step counting accuracy, third-party app support
Cons: ECG functionality, LTE connectivity
The operating system experience was criticized as somewhat clunky despite the watch's appealing design.
Pros: activity auto-detection, build quality
Cons: blood oxygen tracking, Bluetooth connectivity