Review: Garmin Forerunner 570

Updated: 1 day ago
4.2
Based on methodology below
226
Insights analyzed
52
Grouped by key features
18
From expert reviews
Scores below reflect consolidated expert coverage across these features.
Bottom Line

Choose it for superb GPS and heart-rate accuracy, a gorgeous bright AMOLED display, and deep training tools. Skip it if you want stronger battery life, offline maps, ECG, or better value.

Best for

Runners and triathletes who want elite-feeling GPS and heart-rate accuracy, a very bright AMOLED screen, and Garmin’s deep training-readiness and coaching tools.

Not for

Shoppers who prioritize value, longer battery life with always-on display, offline maps, or ECG support. Those buyers are the ones most likely to feel the omissions and price hike.

Verdict

The Forerunner 570 is a polished, high-performing running and multisport watch that improves meaningfully in display quality, heart-rate accuracy, design, and smart features. Reviewers were especially consistent about its GPS and heart-rate performance, bright AMOLED screen, and strong coaching ecosystem for runners and triathletes. The tradeoff is value: many reviews say Garmin raised the price faster than the feature set improved. Battery life is also a compromise, especially with the always-on display, and the missing ECG and offline maps are hard to ignore at this price. If performance and training guidance matter more than absolute value, the 570 is easy to like, but it is also easy to question.

Pros

  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    brightness: 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    Brightness is a standout strength, with multiple reviews describing the screen as one of Garmin’s brightest and easiest to read outdoors.
  • 4.9
    based on 2 reviews
    outdoor visibility: 4.9, based on 2 reviews
    Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers saying the display remains easy to read in bright sunlight and other tough conditions.
  • 4.8
    based on 9 reviews
    display quality: 4.8, based on 9 reviews
    Display quality is excellent. Reviewers repeatedly call the AMOLED screen brighter, sharper, clearer, and more vivid than the previous generation.
  • 4.8
    based on 13 reviews
    GPS accuracy: 4.8, based on 13 reviews
    GPS accuracy is one of the strongest areas. Across city runs, trails, and side-by-side tests, reviews consistently describe tracking as excellent, flawless, or near flawless.
  • 4.8
    based on 7 reviews
    workout tracking variety: 4.8, based on 7 reviews
    Workout coverage is excellent. Reviewers repeatedly mention broad activity support, triathlon and multisport tools, and dozens of sport modes.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    fit: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Fit is excellent when sized correctly, with reviewers describing the watch as secure, flush on the wrist, and almost second-skin-like.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    button controls: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Button controls are one of the watch’s practical strengths. Reviewers like the five-button layout and say it works reliably when touch is less convenient.
  • 4.7
    based on 1 review
    fitness tracking accuracy: 4.7, based on 1 review
    Fitness tracking is broadly praised, with one review calling the core tracking accuracy second to none for the watch’s main sports focus.
  • 4.7
    based on 2 reviews
    reliability: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
    General reliability is strong, with reviewers saying the watch can be relied on for training and that key controls remain responsive even after submersion.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    recovery insights: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Recovery guidance is strong. Reviews highlight training readiness, recovery time, and daily summaries that help frame when to push and when to back off.
  • 4.6
    based on 13 reviews
    heart rate accuracy: 4.6, based on 13 reviews
    Heart-rate tracking is a major strength. Multiple reviewers say it stays close to chest straps, performs well in intervals, and is one of Garmin’s better recent sensors.
  • 4.6
    based on 8 reviews
    comfort: 4.6, based on 8 reviews
    Comfort is a major plus. Across sizes and use cases, reviewers repeatedly say the watch is easy to wear for workouts, daily use, and even overnight.
  • 4.6
    based on 3 reviews
    durability: 4.6, based on 3 reviews
    Durability impressions are positive. Reviewers mention scratch resistance, pristine condition after use, and very little visible wear over time.
  • 4.6
    based on 3 reviews
    operating system experience: 4.6, based on 3 reviews
    The overall software experience is modern and capable. Reviewers describe it as faster, more polished, and close in feel to Garmin’s higher-end models.
  • 4.6
    based on 1 review
    build quality: 4.6, based on 1 review
    Build quality feels premium for the line, with one review explicitly describing it as a high-quality watch.
  • 4.6
    based on 1 review
    menu navigation: 4.6, based on 1 review
    Menu navigation is easy to learn and generally straightforward, helped by the refreshed layout and button-plus-touch design.
  • 4.6
    based on 8 reviews
    coaching features: 4.6, based on 8 reviews
    Coaching features are well developed, especially for runners and triathletes. Garmin Coach plans, daily suggestions, and structured guidance were consistently praised.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    wellness insights: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Wellness insights are a standout. Body Battery, Sleep Score, energy level, and broader readiness-style insights were repeatedly cited as genuinely useful.
  • 4.6
    based on 7 reviews
    style and design: 4.6, based on 7 reviews
    The design is widely liked. Reviewers highlight the brighter colors, more expressive styling, and a look that feels more refined than past Forerunners.
  • 4.6
    based on 2 reviews
    watch face quality: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
    Watch-face customization is strong, with reviewers calling the default face clean and noting that layouts and displayed data can be tailored easily.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    touchscreen responsiveness: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Touch response is consistently described as responsive and easy to use, especially alongside the physical-button setup.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    band quality: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Band quality is good, with soft silicone straps and positive comments about long-term wear and durability.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    third-party app support: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Third-party service support is solid for a sports watch, with repeated mentions of Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music support.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    charging speed: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Charging speed is fine in practice, with one long-term reviewer saying it can top up from empty to full during a shower.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    customization options: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Customization is a strength. Reviews mention editable glance folders, assignable shortcuts, and flexible watch-face or data layout changes.
  • 4.4
    based on 7 reviews
    user interface: 4.4, based on 7 reviews
    The interface is widely praised for feeling slicker, cleaner, more intuitive, and more modern than older Garmin implementations.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    materials quality: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Material choices are a step up from older mid-range Forerunners, especially the aluminum bezel and sturdier-feeling case construction.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    water resistance: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Water resistance is solid for swimming use. Reviews mention pool use, open-water suitability, and repeated use in lakes or the ocean without issue.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    cross-platform compatibility: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    Cross-platform support looks good overall, with smooth iPhone use noted in one review and phone-assistant access highlighted in another.
  • 4.4
    based on 1 review
    safety features: 4.4, based on 1 review
    Safety coverage includes Garmin’s Incident Detection and LiveTrack features for activity sharing and emergency notifications.
  • 4.4
    based on 1 review
    step counting accuracy: 4.4, based on 1 review
    Step counting looked solid in direct testing, with one reviewer finding the watch was off by only around 40 steps in repeated checks.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    health tracking accuracy: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Health stats are generally described as good, with one data-driven review calling overall stat accuracy solid and another saying heart-rate and sleep-stage tracking are pretty good.
  • 4.3
    based on 1 review
    contactless payments: 4.3, based on 1 review
    NFC payments are available, giving the watch a useful everyday smartwatch feature beyond training tools.
  • 4.3
    based on 6 reviews
    smartwatch features: 4.3, based on 6 reviews
    Smartwatch features are improved meaningfully with the added speaker, microphone, voice tools, and day-to-day conveniences, even if the watch still prioritizes sport over general smartwatch depth.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    Bluetooth connectivity: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Bluetooth support is functional for phone-linked features and external sensor pairing, including Bluetooth and ANT+ accessory support.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    stress tracking: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Stress is part of the recovery picture rather than a headline feature, with one reviewer specifically noting that stress levels feed into the watch’s overall readiness guidance.
  • 4.1
    based on 1 review
    music controls: 4.1, based on 1 review
    Music controls are present and usable, including the ability to check what is playing from services like Spotify.
  • 4.1
    based on 6 reviews
    size options: 4.1, based on 6 reviews
    Two case sizes broaden the fit range, and multiple reviewers specifically call out the benefit of having both 42mm and 47mm options.
  • 4.0
    based on 7 reviews
    call handling: 4.0, based on 7 reviews
    Call support is a useful upgrade rather than a must-have killer feature. Reviewers generally found wrist calls workable and clear enough when paired to a phone.
  • 4.0
    based on 3 reviews
    companion app quality: 4.0, based on 3 reviews
    Garmin Connect is usually viewed positively for depth and data richness, though the new subscription layer is a recurring annoyance in the reviews.
  • 4.0
    based on 7 reviews
    voice assistant quality: 4.0, based on 7 reviews
    Voice features are mostly good for simple commands, timers, and phone-assistant access, though one reviewer reported crashes and awkward behavior with the phone assistant.
  • 4.0
    based on 4 reviews
    blood oxygen tracking: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
    The watch includes blood-oxygen-related health sensing, with reviewers mentioning a pulse oximeter and overnight blood-oxygen or saturation tracking as part of the health stack.
  • 4.0
    based on 4 reviews
    onboard music storage: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
    Onboard music storage is useful but not generous. Reviews note 8GB of storage and MP3 support, with some calling the capacity a bit stingy.
  • 3.7
    based on 5 reviews
    sleep tracking accuracy: 3.7, based on 5 reviews
    Sleep tracking is useful but not flawless. Reviews say it is reasonably accurate and helpful for readiness, though some found it less robust than the best sleep-focused competitors.
  • 3.7
    based on 2 reviews
    app ecosystem: 3.7, based on 2 reviews
    The app ecosystem is useful but not expansive. Reviewers mention ConnectIQ apps and data fields, while also noting that Garmin’s ecosystem feels more limited than watchOS or Wear OS.
  • 3.5
    based on 4 reviews
    smartphone notifications: 3.5, based on 4 reviews
    Notifications work, but the experience is mixed. Some reviewers had smooth delivery, while others found text truncated or alerts too persistent on screen.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 2 reviews
    pairing reliability: 3.4, based on 2 reviews
    Pairing reliability is mixed. One reviewer found syncing smooth and seamless, while another reported repeated disconnect-and-reconnect behavior.
  • 3.2
    based on 15 reviews
    battery life: 3.2, based on 15 reviews
    Battery life is the biggest tradeoff. Some reviewers still found it good in normal use, but many say the brighter screen makes it noticeably weaker than the 265, especially with always-on display.
  • 2.9
    based on 3 reviews
    software smoothness: 2.9, based on 3 reviews
    Software smoothness is generally strong, but not perfect. Some reviews call the experience polished, while others report crashes or temporary unresponsiveness in edge cases.
  • 2.8
    based on 2 reviews
    charging convenience: 2.8, based on 2 reviews
    Charging convenience is less impressive. Reviewers specifically wanted wireless charging and also called out the proprietary cable setup.
  • 2.7
    based on 11 reviews
    value for money: 2.7, based on 11 reviews
    Value for money is the main weakness. Most reviews say the watch is too expensive for what it adds over the 265, though a small number of owners still felt very happy with the purchase.
  • 1.5
    based on 10 reviews
    ECG functionality: 1.5, based on 10 reviews
    ECG is a clear miss. Reviewers repeatedly call out that the Forerunner 570 lacks ECG despite using Garmin’s newer sensor hardware.

FAQ

Is the Garmin Forerunner 570 accurate for running and training?

Based on the reviews, yes. GPS accuracy and heart-rate accuracy are the watch’s strongest areas, with multiple reviewers comparing them favorably to chest straps or other premium watches.

Does the Forerunner 570 have ECG or full offline maps?

No. Reviewers repeatedly call out the lack of ECG and the absence of proper offline maps, which are two of the most common complaints about the watch.

How is the battery life in real use?

Battery impressions are mixed. Some reviewers got around a week or more with lighter settings, but many reported roughly 3 to 5 days with heavier use or the always-on display enabled.

Who is this watch best suited for?

The reviews point to runners and triathletes who want a bright AMOLED screen, strong GPS and heart-rate performance, and Garmin’s deep coaching and readiness tools more than top-tier smartwatch value.

Reviews we analyzed

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

#1
4.3
Choose the Ultra 3 if you want Apple’s biggest screen, strong GPS, and satellite safety in one smartwatch. Skip it if you need...
Pros: display quality, brightness, outdoor visibility, app ecosystem, smartwatch features, water resistance, workout tracking variety
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, size options, value for money, fit, companion app quality, coaching features
#2
4.2
Choose it if you want the best-balanced Apple Watch with better battery life and tougher glass. Skip it if you already own a...
Pros: app ecosystem, workout tracking variety, display quality, third-party app support, contactless payments, software smoothness, brightness
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, recovery insights, companion app quality, coaching features
#3
4.2
Choose it for superb comfort, a bright screen, and genuinely useful Gemini and health tools. Skip it if you need multi-day battery life...
Pros: third-party app support, fit, comfort, app ecosystem, brightness, outdoor visibility, heart rate accuracy
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, battery life, reliability, charging convenience
#4
4.2
Choose it for superb GPS and heart-rate accuracy, a gorgeous bright AMOLED display, and deep training tools. Skip it if you want stronger...
Pros: brightness, outdoor visibility, display quality, workout tracking variety, GPS accuracy, fit, button controls
Cons: ECG functionality, value for money, charging convenience, software smoothness, battery life, pairing reliability