Fingerprint performance is one of the strongest themes: reviewers repeatedly describe it as fast, accurate, and reliable, often unlocking in under a second. A few note occasional misses can be improved by enrolling the same finger more than once.
Fingerprint performance is consistently framed as one of the best at the price: near-instant unlock (often around 0.42 seconds), high accuracy, and strong day-to-day reliability, with occasional second-try success when a read fails.
Fingerprint access is commonly described as very fast and improving over time, though at least one hands-on review notes occasional missed scans rather than perfection.
Fingerprint unlocking is consistently a standout: fast (often cited under 0.5s) and accurate, with storage kept on-device. Wet fingers or cuts can cause retries, but overall performance is excellent.
Fingerprint performance is a standout: most reviewers describe it as fast and accurate with quick setup. A few note that finger positioning/angle can matter and some users (especially older users in anecdotal feedback) may see inconsistent scans, but overall sentiment is strongly positive.
Biometric access is a core strength, implemented here as palm-vein recognition. Reviews generally find it fast and accurate once you learn the hand position, though a few note it can be sensitive to angle or may need a wake-up touch in some conditions to save battery.
Across reviews, fingerprint unlock is consistently fast and accurate. Limitations show up with wet or dirty fingers and sensor ergonomics for some hands, and several sources describe a two-fingerprint-per-user limit (with workarounds).
Fingerprint performance is polarizing: several owners describe it as among the fastest and most accurate they have used, while one expert reviewer struggled with repeated reads and wished for clearer activation feedback (lighting).
Fingerprint performance is repeatedly described as quick and accurate, often serving as the preferred backup method even for users who primarily rely on UWB. Several reviews note that fingerprint enrollment can be handled via the app or directly on-lock in certain workflows.
Fingerprint unlocking is usually fast and convenient, especially when the keypad maintains an active connection to the lock. A few reports mention missed reads (or smaller fingers struggling) and occasional scanner flakiness, which makes a PIN/NFC fallback valuable.
Fingerprint unlock is typically quick and accurate, though at least one reviewer found it hit-or-miss depending on finger angle and the scanner’s placement.
Fingerprint access is a headline feature and is often described as quick and accurate for the price, with support for up to about 50 fingerprints; one review found it hit-or-miss and requiring multiple scans.
Fingerprint access is usually described as quick and usable, but experiences vary: some found it reliable, others needed multiple tries or noted setup is slower than palm enrollment and can be harder for some users (including kids).
Fingerprint unlocking (on Touch models) is often described as extremely fast and accurate, yet at least one long-term owner reports recurring failures that require re-enrollment, suggesting this feature’s reliability can vary by unit and environment.
The D1 Pro model is reviewed primarily for palm-vein unlocking rather than fingerprint scanning. One related TCL lock review (the non-Pro D1) praises a fingerprint reader, but that feature should not be assumed on the D1 Pro unless the specific variant includes it.
Most reviews of the standard package describe fingerprint unlocking as missing, which limits advanced keyless options compared with some competitors. One setup/demo review covers a keypad touch variant that adds fingerprint enrollment and use.
Most reviews state there is no fingerprint reader, and some frame this as a missed feature at the price. One overview-style video appears to describe biometrics, but this conflicts with the rest of the review set.
Fingerprint entry is not included, and at least one reviewer flags this as a missing convenience feature compared with similarly priced competitors that bundle fingerprint readers.
Multiple sources emphasize the lack of a fingerprint reader as the main feature loss versus the U100, which is a dealbreaker for users who rely on biometric entry.