The First Berserker: Khazan

The First Berserker: Khazan Review

Released: March 27, 2025
Updated: 2 months ago
4.0
Overall review score
274
Review evidence points
63
Scored features
25
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose The First Berserker: Khazan for demanding, skill-heavy action and standout boss fights. Skip it if brutal spikes, thin storytelling, reused missions, or loot-menu friction will wear you down.

Best for

Best for Soulslike and hardcore action fans who enjoy learning bosses, refining builds, and pushing through tough encounters for a high-satisfaction payoff.

Not for

Not for players who want forgiving difficulty, rich character drama, broad exploration, multiplayer, or a low-friction loot and menu experience.

Verdict

The review evidence points to an action RPG carried by combat, bosses, and presentation more than story or level structure. Reviewers repeatedly praise Khazan’s fast, precise combat, distinct weapons, strong boss encounters, and stylish cel-shaded art. The tradeoff is that the same intensity can become punishing: several reviews flag brutal early walls, stamina pressure, second-phase frustration, or uneven balance. Narrative and character depth are also inconsistent, with many calling the revenge story coherent but thin, predictable, or underdeveloped. Level and mission design divide reviewers sharply; shortcuts and exploration rewards help, but recycled side missions, boss reuse, and samey areas are common caveats.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

63 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    24 (38%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (33%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (16%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    8 (13%)

Pros

  • 4.8
    18 reviews strong consensus
    boss design: 4.8, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    Boss design is the strongest point of consensus, with many reviewers calling bosses excellent, memorable, fair, intuitive, and satisfying despite some reuse or harshness.
  • 4.7
    21 reviews strong consensus
    combat system: 4.7, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Combat is the product’s clearest strength: reviewers repeatedly call it fast, satisfying, deep, and among the genre’s best, with only a few reservations about stamina or consistency.
  • 4.8
    12 reviews strong consensus
    fun factor: 4.8, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Fun factor is very strong overall, with many reviewers saying the game is joyful, addictive, satisfying, or peak despite difficulty.
  • 4.7
    11 reviews strong consensus
    progression system: 4.7, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Progression is broadly praised, especially boss-attempt rewards, free skill respecs, and multiple growth systems that keep failures productive.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    performance optimization: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Performance optimization is strongly praised, with multiple reviewers reporting pristine or highly optimized performance.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    art direction: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Art direction is broadly praised for its cel-shaded, anime-inflected, gothic style, though originality concerns remain elsewhere.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    graphics quality: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Graphics and visuals are viewed positively, with reviewers praising cel-shading, presentation, and attractive visual identity.
  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    voice acting: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Voice acting is consistently praised, especially the English performances and lead voice work.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    controls responsiveness: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Controls are described as smooth, tight, responsive, and precise, helping the demanding fights feel skill-based.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    sound design: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Sound design is praised for impact, weapon clashes, parry sounds, and matching the game’s brutal tone.
  • 4.1
    12 reviews strong consensus
    skill tree depth: 4.1, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Skill trees are usually praised for depth and experimentation, though some reviewers say build variety remains narrower than expected.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    checkpoint system: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Checkpoint placement is praised, especially checkpoints before bosses that reduce runback frustration.

Cons

  • 2.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    side character depth: 2.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Side characters are a recurring weakness, often described as generic, shallow, or not meaningfully integrated.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    live-service support: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Live-service support looks uncertain in post-release coverage, with reports of a likely final patch and a murky future.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    mission design: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Mission design is a weak spot in the harsher reviews, with complaints that missions can feel like formalities or use puzzling reset structures.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    onboarding experience: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Onboarding is uneven: tutorials can work, but some reviewers say the intro and early ramp fail to showcase or teach the best systems well.
  • 2.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    originality: 2.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Originality is mixed to weak: reviewers often call the game derivative, while still noting that it executes borrowed ideas well.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    AI behavior: 2.0, 1 review
    AI behavior is criticized where it appears, with one review calling it braindead.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in save system reliability, boss design, checkpoint system, near average in level design, difficulty balance, below average in lore depth, character development, live-service support.

Comparison summary

63 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    29 (46%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    16 (25%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    18 (29%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
lore depth 2.0 4.1 -2.1
character development 2.0 4.0 -2.0
live-service support 2.0 3.9 -1.9
save system reliability 5.0 3.1 +1.9
side character depth 2.0 3.8 -1.8
onboarding experience 2.3 3.9 -1.7
learning curve 2.0 3.5 -1.5
mission design 2.0 3.5 -1.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better character development

Choose Ghost of Yōtei. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for character development, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better replay value

Choose Saros. It scores 4.7 vs 3.0 for replay value, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Elden Ring

  • Compared: boss-run quality-of-life COGconnected compares Khazan’s boss retry comfort with lessons FromSoft learned in Elden Ring.
  • Worse: story clarity Digital Trends says Khazan’s story is easier to follow than Elden Ring’s cryptic lore.
  • Better: early difficulty flexibility IGN says Elden Ring offers more ways to overcome an early boss than Khazan.

Nioh

  • Similar: mechanical influence RPS says Khazan takes core ideas from Nioh.
  • Similar: gameplay influence The reviewer says Khazan leans toward the Nioh side of Soulslike design.

Sekiro

  • Similar: parry design RPS says Khazan layers Sekiro-style parrying onto Nioh-like foundations.
  • Worse: defensive combat flexibility Khazan allows dodging and guarding instead of requiring constant parrying like Sekiro.

FAQ

Is The First Berserker: Khazan mostly praised or criticized?

The review set is broadly positive on combat and bosses, but mixed overall because story, level design, mission reuse, and difficulty spikes draw repeated criticism.

Is the combat the main reason to play?

Yes. Across the reviews, combat feel, responsiveness, weapon identity, and boss learning are the strongest recurring positives.

How hard is it?

Reviewers describe it as demanding and sometimes brutal. Some find the challenge fair, while others report early walls, stamina problems, or unbalanced boss pressure.

Does the story matter?

The revenge setup is clear enough and occasionally entertaining, but many reviewers say the narrative, side characters, and protagonist depth are not the main draw.

Are the levels good?

Opinions split. Some reviewers praise shortcuts, layouts, and memorable areas, while others criticize linearity, samey missions, weak exploration, or recycled side content.

Is there replay value?

There is some replay value through New Game+, weapon experimentation, boss refights, and gear systems, but reviewers also note limited build variety and repeated content.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Hades II
4.6

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: skill tree depth, dialogue quality

Cons: emotional impact, economy and resource balance

#2 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.5

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#3 It Takes Two
4.5

Best for joyful, inventive co-op with a partner, especially on couch. Skip it if divorce themes, uneven story tone, or Switch visual compromises would distract you.

Pros: core gameplay loop, movement feel

Cons: character development, dialogue quality

#4 Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
4.5

Choose Clair Obscur if you want a story-rich RPG with thrilling timed combat, gorgeous art, and standout music. Skip it if poor maps, tight parry timing, or occasional bugs and...

Pros: monetization fairness, microtransaction impact

Cons: platforming precision, menu usability