Best 2025 Video Games for tutorial quality

#1

The tutorial was praised for teaching systems naturally and creating meaningful choices early.

#2

Tutorials for new character mechanics were praised for making complexity easier to absorb.

#3

VR Training/tutorial support is praised as both useful and fun for refreshing mechanics.

#4

Tutorial quality had limited but positive evidence, with the game naturally teaching powers as they become relevant.

#5

Tutorial quality is positive where one reviewer says the early tutorials made combat options easy to understand and apply.

#6

Tutorials receive positive notice for being clear and non-intrusive.

#7

Training tools are repeatedly praised for hitboxes, input displays, and robust practice support, though one review still wished for fuller tutorials.

#8

Tutorials and training were praised for explaining the unusual control system and easing players into the mechanics.

#9

Tutorial coverage was repeatedly praised as useful for onboarding, refreshers, and explaining systems clearly enough for new or rusty players.

#10

Tutorial quality was positive in direct evidence, with a decent early tutorial session helping new Warriors players.

#11

Tutorialization was praised for trusting players and avoiding heavy spoon-feeding while still keeping puzzles understandable.

#12

Early missions were described as solid introductions to the basics before later quest repetition set in.

#13

Tutorial missions are appreciated for being skippable while still useful for learning Life nuances.

#14

Tutorial/onboarding evidence is modestly positive, praising learn-by-doing design and seamless early teaching.

#15

Tutorial and guidance additions are viewed positively for modern players, especially optional tips and compass support.

#16

Tutorials range from well laid out and deep to too barebones for explaining advanced context such as Rev Blow defense, feints, and brakes.

#17

Tutorial and mission teaching were mixed: P-Switches can teach mechanics well, but the game also explains little upfront.

#18

tutorial/training support was mixed, with class introduction praised but free practice options missed.

#19

Tutorial quality and explainers improved, though a few reviewers still wanted more help around jobs and systems.

#20

Tutorial quality was acknowledged as necessary for the new systems, though one reviewer wished it could be skipped.

#21

Tutorial quality was mixed, with one reviewer calling it decent while others criticized dense text screens and poor explanations.

#22

Tutorial quality was mixed, with one review praising narrative framing and others criticizing overbearing or overly obvious guidance.

#23

Tutorial quality is criticized through comparison with Hollow Knight’s clearer early tutorial structure and more generous opening support.

#24

Tutorial quality drew a clear complaint around poorly explained cooking, and another reviewer warned that combat systems lack intuitive onboarding.

#25

Guidance split reviewers; some appreciated direction, but many disliked hand-holding, repeated hints, or tutorialization.

#26

Tutorial quality is criticized for a weak opening tutorial and for leaving important movement or systems unexplained.

#27

Tutorial/training presentation received limited criticism, with playable flashbacks described as an odd choice after players had already learned the skills.

#28

Tutorial coverage was criticized by one reviewer for glossing over some early systems.

#29

Tutorial delivery was criticized in the supporting review for interrupting pacing despite gradual mechanic introduction.

#30

Tutorial quality was inconsistent: some tutorials were unobtrusive, but several reviewers found key mechanics buried, brief, or poorly explained.

#31

Tutorials and Civilopedia support were polarizing, ranging from rich and useful for newcomers to inadequate, overexplained, or missing key information.

#32

Tutorial quality was criticized as brief and rudimentary for a complex multiplayer roguelike.

#33

Tutorial quality was criticized by reviewers who felt the game barely explained itself and left players lost early.