Best 2024 Gaming Mice for button customization

#1 Turtle Beach Kone II
4.8

Button customization was one of the most consistently praised features, with reviewers emphasizing Easy-Shift, broad remapping, and extensive command options.

Pros: click latency, motion consistency

Cons: handedness options, portability

#2 Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6

Customization was a major strength, with extensive remapping, HyperShift, and button control through Synapse.

Pros: lift-off distance, motion consistency

Cons: cross-platform compatibility, handedness options

#3 Turtle Beach Kone II Air
4.6

Button customization was consistently praised, especially Easy-Shift and profile-based control, though one review wanted more useful default secondary functions.

Pros: left and right click quality, software stability

Cons: polling rate, cross-platform compatibility

#4 Corsair M75 Wireless
4.6

Button customization was consistently praised for flexible remapping and personalized layouts.

Pros: handedness options, Accuracy and tracking precision

Cons: tilt gesture controls, software stability

#5 ASUS ROG Strix Impact III Wireless
4.5

Button customization is a strength, with reviewers highlighting unusually good customization for the price, gameplay versatility, and broad control in software.

Pros: motion consistency, Accuracy and tracking precision

Cons: cable flexibility, palm grip comfort

#6 ASUS ROG Harpe Ace Mini
4.5

Button customization was praised for easy programming and broad finetuning options.

Pros: cable flexibility, weight

Cons: software stability, handedness options

#7 Logitech G Pro 2 Lightspeed
4.4

Button customization is a major advantage, with reviewers praising the easy magnetic swaps, remapping flexibility, and G Hub input options.

Pros: palm grip comfort, handedness options

Cons: Bluetooth support, MMO gaming suitability

#8 Turtle Beach Burst II Air
4.3

Button customization was considered useful and easy in Swarm II, though one review called the limited remappable options a constraint.

Pros: weight, balance and weight distribution

Cons: water and dust resistance, RGB features

#9 Logitech G309 Lightspeed
4.2

Button customization was considered useful through G Hub, with remapping and binding flexibility praised even when advanced depth was limited.

Pros: click latency, onboard memory

Cons: lift-off distance, debounce customization

#10 NZXT Lift 2 Ergo
4.2

Button customization was considered useful and broad overall, though one reviewer called out the limited number of buttons available for mapping.

Pros: FPS gaming suitability, weight

Cons: fingertip grip comfort, handedness options

#11 Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX
4.1

Button customization was strong in software, especially drag-and-drop remapping, but constrained by the DEX's simplified button layout.

Pros: motion consistency, acceleration control

Cons: cable flexibility, cross-platform compatibility

#12 Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed
4.1

Button customization and rebinding were useful through Synapse, although most of the praise was tied to practical remapping rather than a large button count.

Pros: click latency, motion consistency

Cons: handedness options, Bluetooth support

#13 Razer Viper V3 Pro
4.0

Button customization was considered strong because Synapse supports remapping, HyperShift layers, and profile-specific setup.

Pros: click latency, balance and weight distribution

Cons: 2.4GHz connectivity, software stability

#14 ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Customization was considered adequate to strong where reviewers described remapping, DPI, and profile tools as straightforward or sufficient.

Pros: connection stability, weight

Cons: handedness options, software usability

#15 ROG Harpe Ace Extreme
4.0

Button remapping and assignment were available and generally treated as straightforward, especially through the lighter Armoury Crate Gear software.

Pros: Accuracy and tracking precision, sensor performance

Cons: software stability, value for money

#16 Endgame Gear XM2we
3.8

Button remapping was considered functional and easy, but reviewers described the options as basic rather than deep.

Pros: drag click support, claw grip comfort

Cons: handedness options, Bluetooth support

#17 HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Mini
2.9

Button customization was described as basic, with missing system-level and media shortcut options limiting depth.

Pros: cable flexibility, connection stability

Cons: motion consistency, software stability

#18 Cherry M68 Pro
2.8

Button customization was limited in the one scored review, which said the mouse restricts customization.

Pros: 2.4GHz connectivity, long-session comfort

Cons: debounce customization, fingertip grip comfort

#19 Cherry M68 Pro
2.0

Button customization was limited by the software-free design, especially for remapping and fine adjustments.

Pros: 2.4GHz connectivity, long-session comfort

Cons: programmable buttons, button customization